|
|
|
|
|
|
Amazon.com, 
Amazon.co.uk, 
Amazon.de or 
Amazon.ca
|
 Better Red Than... Green?by Stuart Atkinson Page 1 of 2 January 2000, and as it shines like a faint red star in the sunset glow,
Mars has never been more inspiring or frustrating. In the last few months
not one but two probes have reached Mars, only to vanish before sending back
even one image or crackle of static. All we can do is seek comfort in our
well-thumbed copies of National Geographic, flicking through the pages of
pictures sent back by the Pathfinder probe and its plucky little rover,
Sojourner, two and a half years ago, and dream of what Might Have Been...
Meanwhile, the public hunger for things Martian shows no signs of being satisfied. The bookshops are full of titles about the Red Planet, the shelves are groaning under their weight in the fact and fiction sections alike, as science fiction novels and technical papers and journals continue to bathe in the post-ALH84001 glow. And despite the failures of the Climate Observer and Polar Lander, even disillusioned space activists are talking openly once more about the possibility of manned missions a couple of decades into the next century. We're talking about the future with renewed confidence. And that red future holds many things for the intrepid martian explorers; exhausting treks down the Mariner Valley, circumnavigations of the Olympus Mons caldera, and much more. But you don't have to be psychic to predict that within a hundred years - when all the science has been done, when we've gathered our rock samples and proved one way or another the existence of native martian life - history will repeat itself and Mars will become a New World, a frontier to be tamed, an ochre-coloured Wild West where individuals, corporations and governments all stake their claims to the land and its resources. If the Tom Cruise film "Far and Away" had been set on Mars it would have been a glimpse into the future. But what will they - the Settlers - do after they've carved up the New World? One answer would be to terraform Mars, to make it more like Earth by thickening its atmosphere, melting its ice caps and... well, you all know how they'd do it, everyone reading this magazine will be familiar with the concept, and if you're not then all you have to do is read the best-selling Mars Trilogy books of Kim Stanley Robinson. When it comes to terraforming, there's no fence to sit on. You're either a Green, or a Red, Greens being pro, Reds being anti. I'm proud to say I'm a Red, I was before I even read the books, and the very thought of terraforming Mars makes me feel both angry and sick. To be fair, the Greens have some convincing arguments, dwindling resources and living space on Earth being the most obvious, but they don't move me. I just don't think it will ever happen, and here's why. Firstly, it will just take too long, many hundreds of years at the very best, and probably several - if not tens of thousands of years. By the time we can even think about beginning the terraforming process it'll be easier and cheaper to build space stations and habitats in Earth orbit, using lunar resources. It makes more sense to occupy the Moon first - it's nearer for a start - and build domes over small craters and live in there before moving on to settle inside larger features such as Eratosthenes and Copernicus, craters with floors big enough to actually landscape. And long before the first comet blazes to its death through the martian atmosphere, settlements will be springing up on near Earth asteroids. And think about this. If the process of terraforming Mars took only a thousand years, in that time - even without the development of ships like the Enterprise - we'll probably have discovered worlds around other stars which need no terraforming at all, which are ready for immediate occupation. And we haven't even mentioned the cost yet! But, as good as those practical arguments against terraforming are, there's one reason why I don't think it will happen: we won't be allowed to do it, not without a helluva fight anyway, because the martians - and by that I mean the native martians, the children of the settlers, not any canyon-dwelling cousins of ET! - will fight against it. They won't want their world turning into a mock-Earth! They'll be fiercely proud of its barren landscapes. They won't want it turning into Earth #2 because they'll feel no affinity to or affection for Earth #1. Copyright© 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 Stuart Atkinson, sffworld.com. All rights reserved. No part of this may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the author. |
Copyright © 1999 - 2004 sffworld.com