Home Literature Stories Movies Games Comics Blogs News Forum FunZone Art Gallery
   
Author

Site Index

Book Info 

The Stone and The Maiden by Dennis Jones   (10 ratings)

A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - J - K - L - M - N - O - P - Q - R - S - T - U - V - W - X - Y - Z

Rating (10 ratings)
Rate this book
(5 best - 1 worst)
 
Book Information  
AuthorDennis Jones
TitleThe Stone and The Maiden
Series
Volume0
Year1999
GenreFantasy
 
Book Reviews (submitted by readers)
 
Submitted by Heresy 
(Aug 17, 2007)

(I have not yet finished this book, but I will try to write another review once I am should my opinions change. If not, then the review stands as is.)

However, midway in, I feel I have several points to mention about the style of writing I’m seeing in The Stone and the Maiden. Firstly, I want to point out that while there’s a definite flow of imagery - there are just wonderful paragraphs that work as if we’re looking at pictures - I feel that overall there’s simply not enough spread to the rest of the book. There should be more than just a few token scatterings of these. What these paragraphs show is that he does have the skill to paint these images, but he does so sparingly. I wish he would do more.

The novel’s backstory “tells” more than it “shows”. A perfect example is the villain’s back-story. It would have best been served as a mystery slowly being answered throughout the story instead of being a HUGE info dump right near the front of the book. You’re given a taste in the very first chapter, and then suddenly it’s thrown out at you in Chapter 4 in long agonizing detail. I felt that detracted from the book immensely. I don’t like being told things right at the beginning of the story, I like having it shown to me throughout.

As to motivation...

The best way to explain this is to pay attention to how the villain is introduced - a man without a sufficient motive. It would have been more believable if the villain had been his mother because at she has justifiable cause due to what his father did to her. What’s his motivation? Being bad for the sake of being bad? Why? That’s kinda of... careless. You go through the trouble to create a story you want to be high fantasy, but you give the villain nothing of which to inspire the reader to hate or like him. Sure, he “kills” people to empower his chain, however the good guys also kill the enemy too... I didn’t really feel anything for the villain except contempt at the writer for not doing better when he has it in his power to do better. The villain just existed for the sake of existing. >_<

As it stands, even the characters in this book simply exist. By this I mean, we get people who are already established place-cards. They are who they are and that’s what we get. While this is NOT necessarily a bad thing, I feel that they needed at least a character flaw - something for the reader population to identify with. For me personally, I like seeing when characters grow and develop, it makes me care for them. I’m not saying that Mandine or Key aren’t strong characters or that they lack a good moral fibre, but we aren’t given any real reason to like or hate them. They are the pinnacle of goodness (while Erkai is evil) and that’s all there is to it. I guess the problem I have is that while I don’t dislike them, I don’t feel for them either.

This is just a pet-peeve for me, but personally, I don’t like seeing the characters constantly complain about other characters so that the reader has an idea what they’re like only by hearsay . Telling in the third person is still telling. I know often time we gossip and that’s how things get told about people, but I rather see a scene where this is displayed instead of being told about it and then jarringly pointing out “See I told you that’s how they treat me, woe is me.”


Would I recommend this book to someone else? Honestly, I don’t know. Right now, it feels like a rehash of old ideas from other authors without any real culmination of character design, plot and feeling. What it needs to have a purpose that makes me care for what’s happening. While certainly not boring, it still manages to be dry enough to lack creative twists for plot and motivation. If I don’t feel for the main characters in the first 100 pages of the book, something is wrong.


 

Latest

The Last Theorem by Arthur C. Clarke
08-28 - Book Review
City at the End of Time by Greg Bear
08-26 - Book Review
SFFWorld News – 8/25/08
08-25 - News
The Shadow Pavilion by Liz Williams
08-19 - Book Review
SFFWorld News – 8/17/08
08-18 - News
Dead Beat by Jim Butcher
08-15 - Book Review
Fallen by Tim Lebbon
08-15 - Book Review
Zoe's Tale by John Scalzi
08-12 - Book Review
Science Fiction: Alive and Kicking
08-08 - Article
SFFWorld News – 8/7/08
08-07 - News
Sly Mongoose by Tobias Buckell
08-07 - Book Review
SFFWorld News – 8/5/08
08-05 - News
Jack Vance Reader, The by Jack Vance
07-31 - Book Review
The Night Sessions by Ken MacLeod
07-29 - Book Review
Interview with David Louis Edelman
07-29 - Interview
Enemy's Son by James Johnson
07-28 - Book Review
The Mirrored Heavens by David J Williams
07-28 - Book Review
The Ten Thousand by Paul Kearney
07-28 - Book Review
Destroyermen I: Into the Storm by Taylor Anderson
07-22 - Book Review
SFFWorld News – 7/20/08
07-21 - News
SFFWorld News – 7/15/08
07-16 - News
MultiReal by David Louis Edelman
07-15 - Book Review
Obituary: Thomas M. Disch
07-10 - News
Interview with Paul Kearney
07-09 - Interview
SFFWorld News – 7/8/08
07-08 - News
Orphan's Journey by Robert Buettner
07-08 - Book Review
Eclipse One by Jonathan Strahan
07-01 - Book Review
Toll the Hounds by Steven Erikson
06-30 - Book Review
The Inferior by Peadar Ó Guilín
06-30 - Book Review
Film News – 6/29/08:
06-30 - News

New Forum Posts


About - Advertising - Contact us - RSS - For Authors & Publishers - Contribute / Submit - Privacy Policy - Community Login
Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use. The contents of this webpage are copyright © 1997-2008 sffworld.com. All Rights Reserved.