BarVybe
February 15th, 2006, 08:43 AM
So - being a yankee and discovering that there were books out there in the UK and Canada not released here i've had the opportunity to read the last three books back to back.
Just talking about style - not plot, likeability of characters, etc. - i found Midnight Tides a hard read. NOT cause it was hard to understand. Rather i found myself skimming some pretty repetitive interior monologue scenes.
You get the point that Trull has doubts. I don't actually need to hear the specific doubts he has about each and every plot element.
One of the things i REALLY love(d) about Erikson is that he respects the reader. The first 4 books are confusing to many precisely because he doesn't tell you whats going on - not just with the plot - but with the characters. You have to grow into his characters through their actions and reactions to each other. He does most of this through dialoge and reporting their actions and responses - NOT by writing things like (and these are of course made up, obvious examples)
"Whiskeyjack found he was unable to control his dislike of Kallor."
or
"'Wow', thought Whiskeyjack, 'I really don't like this guy.'"
I found this sort of thing happening over and over again in MT. Maybe the construction of the plot lent itself to characters who couldn't express their thoughts / feelings through action in the settings / company they found themselves in, but that seems to me to be something a very talented writer could work around.
Now, i'm not saying this is a bad book by any means, just that by comparison to MoI and HoC it's style is...well...not so much to my liking. Almost as if someone forgot to go back in and ruthlessly cut material that was unnecessary and that we already knew:
- Yeah, we already know how Trull feels about that
- Does this amusing banter by Bugg actually move the plot forward? Or should we axe the last 6 verbal spars?
Anyone else feel this way?
If you think about the book - it takes place over a much more compressed period of time and space than the others. There is far less journeying / exploring / description of the world going on here. Perhaps in limitting the scope of the setting in this way, the book lent itself to being filled up with this other material....
Just talking about style - not plot, likeability of characters, etc. - i found Midnight Tides a hard read. NOT cause it was hard to understand. Rather i found myself skimming some pretty repetitive interior monologue scenes.
You get the point that Trull has doubts. I don't actually need to hear the specific doubts he has about each and every plot element.
One of the things i REALLY love(d) about Erikson is that he respects the reader. The first 4 books are confusing to many precisely because he doesn't tell you whats going on - not just with the plot - but with the characters. You have to grow into his characters through their actions and reactions to each other. He does most of this through dialoge and reporting their actions and responses - NOT by writing things like (and these are of course made up, obvious examples)
"Whiskeyjack found he was unable to control his dislike of Kallor."
or
"'Wow', thought Whiskeyjack, 'I really don't like this guy.'"
I found this sort of thing happening over and over again in MT. Maybe the construction of the plot lent itself to characters who couldn't express their thoughts / feelings through action in the settings / company they found themselves in, but that seems to me to be something a very talented writer could work around.
Now, i'm not saying this is a bad book by any means, just that by comparison to MoI and HoC it's style is...well...not so much to my liking. Almost as if someone forgot to go back in and ruthlessly cut material that was unnecessary and that we already knew:
- Yeah, we already know how Trull feels about that
- Does this amusing banter by Bugg actually move the plot forward? Or should we axe the last 6 verbal spars?
Anyone else feel this way?
If you think about the book - it takes place over a much more compressed period of time and space than the others. There is far less journeying / exploring / description of the world going on here. Perhaps in limitting the scope of the setting in this way, the book lent itself to being filled up with this other material....

