Home Literature Stories Movies Games Comics Blogs News Discussion Forum Art Gallery
  Science Fiction and Fantasy News
T. C. McCarthy wins Compton Crook Award (05-24)
New Gemmell Book Announced (04-16)
David Gemmell Award 2012 Short List (04-08)
EDGE LIT Event, Derby (UK) (03-15)

Official sffworld Reviews
The King's Blood by Daniel Abraham (05-23 - Book)
BLACKOUT by Mira Grant (05-22 - Book)
Invincible by Jack Campbell (05-15 - Book)
The Science of Avatar by Stephen Baxter (05-14 - Book)


Site Index

    Bookmark and Share


View Full Version :

Things I Have Noticed


Pages : 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37

KatG
January 25th, 2007, 06:33 PM
Irrelevant thought for a day: Imagine Katherine the Great's gestating fantasy novel as a phone book, on each page a new character drifts off into a 800 word soliloquoy on how things came to be in such a deplorable state. The villain will be overcome by the sheer of mass of profundity heaped on her tortured soul.

Yes, I can imagine what sort of rep for my fiction I'm building with my lecture posts, but people will ask me questions. :) In my fiction, though, one of my problems is that I tend to leave out useful explanatory info and make it too mysterious, and then have to go put it back in. Who'd have thunk it?

HE -- having a sff section in the bookstore does not keep people from wandering the store. It just means that there can be a whole lot more sff than there could be otherwise, because sff is getting additional shelf space. It's been getting category sff out of the back of the store and onto those table displays, where the money is, that's been the tough thing. And now that's become business as usual. Also, we have lots of non-category sff that's getting lots of attention and is indeed being sold not only in general fiction and table displays, but in the sff sections of the bookstore. Rather than category sff selling to a very small group of people, we now have it selling to a very large group of people, who also often read other things. But we can't make young folk read other things than sff if they don't want to. But the sff section of the bookstore is not a funnel -- it's an extra room.

Me, I'm just happy that anybody walks into a bookstore -- they were suppose to be extinct by now, you know.

But who is it who decides where to put McCarthy, for example, when he writes a book like The Road? Is it the publisher who sells it to a particular market or is it the bookstore who wants in in general literature to attract a broader audience? Can a pulisher dictate where it wants its titles to be shelved?

He's not a category sff author with a fanbase in that market. He is a contemporary fiction writer who sometimes does historical stuff. He decided to write a science fiction novel. His regular publisher in the U.S., Knopf, not a category sff publisher, put it out. And most importantly, he is a major bestselling author with massive name recognition. Bestselling authors go in the front of the store, no matter what they write. "The Road" is being marketed and publicized to the category sf audience extensively, through the sff imprints in Random House, but there's no reason for them to then ignore the author's regular fanbase and the potential general fiction audience either -- both of which are larger than the category sf audience.

It's not as rigid as you keep trying to make it, Gary. They want readers, period. The sff section of the bookstore is a way to try and draw in more readers for sff, not keep all the readers in separate categories. By and large, what area of a store you go in is due to what you write, who publishes you, your level of name recognition, and what seems to be the best strategy to present you to the readers who are most likely to buy your work, and any others they can wrangle after that. The bulk of authors are in general fiction. Category authors can get their category section and general fiction too. If they don't fly in general fiction, they at least have their reliable category fan audience. The bigger that category audience grows, the more interest publishers and booksellers have in marketing general fiction to category audiences too.

The big chains often won't buy your books, Gary, because they don't trust your publisher not to screw them. Small presses are notoriously unreliable and book chains don't have time to chase after them. Small presses can build up good impressions in the industry and bookstores may then take a chance, and if they get good service and the titles sell okay, then they may order more from that press. Letting book people get to know you may help with that; it's hard to say.

New thing: The next round in the Hobbit film saga has the head of New Line saying he won't work with Peter Jackson, who is an arrogant greedy man for suing them. Now, accusing actors and directors of being arrogant and greedy in the press sometimes works, but special effects directors like Jackson are busy turning themselves into mini-producing studios with lots of product in the pipeline. This guy at New Line not only pissed off Jackson, but he's cutting his throat with other directors who have lucrative projects.

So the Hobbit may move forward with a new director, but it seems like Jackson's reported strategy of getting the option clock wound down may be working, in which case the film may be delayed several more years.

Radthorne
January 31st, 2007, 10:15 PM
In the category of "publishing's dirty laundry" come stories like this (http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/business/20070127-9999-1b27ams.html). We lowly peons down here in the writing trenches are only fly specks in the world of such happenings, but methinks these things ultimately trickle down to impact us in one way or another.

So, how many of you keep up with such doings? (I already know KatG does...) Or is it all just too depressing?

Sponsor ads
zorobnice
February 1st, 2007, 03:27 AM
My two cents worth KatG. In South Africa we are not half as priviledged as other countries, book stores here do lump the two together, which freaks me out because like Gary I don't read any SF. We don't have the choie you have and the SFF sections are quite small compared to all other genres. We would be lucky if there were 5 or 6 hundred books displayed. They also go just for the very well known names. It was one of the big reasons I joined this forum, was to find new authors. I now almost only order online, because the vast majority of the authors discussed here are not available. If one wants to order through a bookstore it takes at least twice as long to arrive, as from Amazon. The other huge problem we have here is with series. It is not uncommon to see a new book displayed, check it out and find that it is number X in the series, and not one of the previous books will be avalable in the bookstore.

A long two cents, but there you go. :D

KatG
February 1st, 2007, 02:02 PM
I don't check these things out nearly as much as I may seem. I used to get Publishers Weekly, which is the U.S. trade magazine, when I ran my editing business, and that kept me on top of things. But every year, they doubled their subscription price and it was eventually out of my price range. I keep meaning to go over to their web site, where you can get a fair amount of the info of the magazine, but I frequently don't remember. For people trying to write and market in North America, PW is very helpful. Also Locus, for the category field, which I also keep forgetting to subscribe to, but they also have a website.

I've never heard of the company in the news story, but there are such jobber distributors around and they've had a lot of their market shrink, such as the paperbacks market collapsing slowly, and the warehouse stores carrying fewer books now than when they first started out. This particular company won't have much effect on mid-listers, though the money the publishers have lost with them might. If Ingram's ever gets in trouble, though, then the whole industry will be a mess, because Ingram's supplies the NA bookstores.

Zorobrice -- you have a small country with an emerging and challenged economy. Having category markets is a luxury most places are not set up to indulge in. Only if there is a fanbase big enough to support it, does a separate market really get going for specialty types of fiction. But it's great that you can get things brought in online, and at least your bookstores are trying. You also have a great tradition of fantasy literature there. I'd love to see more fantasy from different parts of the world. It's happening but slowly. It's much better than it was twenty years ago.

This is a fun one -- got an announcement from Del Rey in the U.S. Del Rey has set itself as the importer of manga, Japanese graphic novels that are extremely popular with young girls here. Now they are doing their own "original" manga apparently. (We used to just call them comic books, but oh well.) And this is their first publication, which gave me a belly laugh. Seems we're now catching the attention, at least peripherally, of the music scene for tie-ins:


Del Rey Manga will publish the first volume of MAKE 5 WISHES on April 10, 2007. Avril Lavigne's new album The Best Damn Thing will release shortly after on April 17, 2007 from RCA Records. In volume one of MAKE 5 WISHES, introverted teenager Hana stumbles upon a website that will change her life forever. After a demon grants her a series of wishes that go bad, Hana meets her hero Avril Lavigne, who helps her find the courage to conquer her own personal demons once and for all. The concluding volume of MAKE 5 WISHES will release in July 2007. Both volumes will appear in full-color.

More than simply lending her talents to the creative process, multiple award-winning singer, songwriter, model, and actress Avril Lavigne also appears as a character in the manga. When asked what inspired her to be a part of this project, Avril Lavigne had this to say, "I know that many of my fans read manga, and I'm really excited to be involved in creating stories that I know they will enjoy."


Call me when the Rolling Stones do a science fiction novel. I think that would be fun.

Hereford Eye
February 2nd, 2007, 06:58 AM
KISS already did some comics with Marvel.

The digital world continues to present problems for authors, publishers and readers. Consider the convenience of a web search, say, for something about “Why Do They Rope for Short Pay?” Google will return Night Rider’s Lament sung by Garth Brooks, written by Suzy Boggus. Another quick follow-up search will tell you Chris Ledoux also recorded the song.
Well, suppose you heard somewhere about Boskone and were curious what that’s all about. Googole will return immediate information on the Boston convention but you need to go to the next page to find a Wikipedia entry that will tell you: “This article is about the fictional organization in E.E. Smith's Lensman series.” I knew that; I read the series in the early 50s. But, my grandchild is just now being introduced to the Kinnison family.
What’s this got to do with Things I Have Noticed? The current issue of the New Yorker has an article by Jeffrey Toobin dealing with Google’s Book Search project and the legal challenges mounted by some writers and the Authors Guild and, in a second suit, a group of U.S. publishers, publishers who are party to the project at the same time they are suing to stop it.
The project plans to scan the contents of every book ever published and make the contents searchable on the internet. They plan to return the phrase sought, say “Boskone” and ten to twenty lines before and after the reference with a complete identification of the book, its author, and its publisher. This constitutes a unique sales tool which is why the publishers bought into the project.
It also constitutes a threat to copyright protection which is why the law suits to stop the project exist. Ignoring the fact there are other agencies, including Microsoft, pursuing goals similar to Google’s, the question is not if the law suits will be successful. The word on the street is they will be settled out of court so the project is not even hiccupping over the situation but proceeding full steam.
I suspect the reason that they will be settled out of court is that not only is the thought, making all the world’s knowledge available to everyone, a good thought but the ability to recompense authors and publishers is a detail to be ironed out and nothing more.
But, the story does point out that every opportunity the internet presents carries with it side effects such as headaches, stomach ulcers, and, probably, mutated children.

KatG
February 4th, 2007, 02:12 PM
Yeah, it's a tricky situation. Unlike the music industry, books have always had libraries, where you can get books loaned out for free and of course copy them if you are so minded, so a lot of these projects are set up with the notion of building Net libraries, but with all the downloading fears as all the new technologies sort themselves out.

I'm not so certain that either Google or Microsoft really does want to become the Library of Congress and get every book. With research being one of the Net's big uses, the preferences will be to non-fiction works, and fiction will probably be limited to classics, award-winners and bestsellers. I'm betting they don't bother with the bulk of paperback category sff. Ditto most of small press offerings, self-published and online works, and they'll probably cherry-pick the academic and educational presses, who will mind least of all because they've already been doing this type of thing for years. (They helped invent the Net after all -- it was their domain before it was the public's.)

I also wouldn't be surprised if the interest in these projects dies off over time, when they realize it's not enough of an inducement on the research front, and not all that profitable in any other way either. Every one of these electronic projects for books has seemed to wither on the vine. When it comes to something like the Net, video and film content are going to be of more interest overall.

That doesn't shut down the possibility of piracy, especially to markets like Asia where they've had a lot of problems with it. But again, most sff titles, even if they were picked to go into these projects, are not going to get pirated.

Radthorne
February 4th, 2007, 11:05 PM
With research being one of the Net's big uses, the preferences will be to non-fiction works, and fiction will probably be limited to classics, award-winners and bestsellers.
I completely agree. One has to consider where the revenue stream is going to come from here; primarily from online ads. The only way that becomes viable is when you have really big numbers to support it, and that's not going to come from genre readers, really. In fact, I would bet that in the end the non-fiction that gets 'recorded' is going to just be the 'best-seller' stuff too, the current equivalent of "The One Minute Manager" or "Oprah's Lose Weight in 5 Seconds Diet". Real meaty research material might come along for the ride if it's convenient, but that will certainly not be its ultimate focus. Saying that it does, though, on the part of the companies doing it gives the whole thing a greater air of legitmacy.

Hereford Eye
February 5th, 2007, 10:50 AM
As I mentioned earlier, my source is Jeffrey Toobin's article in this month's The New Yorker, wherein the second paragraph asserts: "Google intends to scan every book ever published, and to make the full texts available, in the same way that Web sites can be searched on the company's engine at google.com"
So, if you wish to test the beta version; go to books.google.com and search. I googled Kevin Radthorne and it returned "The Road to Kotaishi."
The article points out that you can enter Ahab and whale and the search returns nearly 800 titles in which the terms appear. When I googled Valentine Michael Smith I got 823 hits, most of which - on the first page - were scholarly discussions of SIASL; I was too lazy to pursue it further.

So, say when the project is completed, I search Shiko Shudojo and Nusumi and get over 800 hits. By checking each hit, getting 20 lines before and after the hit, I can probably read your books on line. Is that an issue for you?

I know it is for me "cause I am too damned lazy and not cheap enough to attempt to read a book that way. But, evidently, it has some authors and the Authors Gild worried.

KatG
February 5th, 2007, 11:55 AM
So wait, do you get the text to Road to Kotaishi, or just some sort of informational entry about the book itself? Do they have the text or don't they?

It sounds like a word finder card catalog sort of thing, which would give you excerpts, but as you point out HE, it would be hard to read any novel that way. Researchers would want summaries more than text. Hackers can steal digital files of the full book -- which I imagine is the main concern. Also of concern is the electronic reproduction of the work without the author getting any royalties from that medium. I am not clear -- is Google paying publishers for these books -- the fee of which a portion would go to the author as an electronic subsidiary right -- or are they just taking them? Authors, agents and publishers have been arguing over electronic rights for awhile now, so this would be related.

Hereford Eye
February 5th, 2007, 12:06 PM
For The Road to Kotaishi, at this point, all they have is reference to the book's vital statistics. For Moby Dick, they have the whole book. It's just a matter of time till Kevin's books are in the pile.
As I understand it - and we know how my mind operates -, lots of publishers went with Google because of the advertising angle. The Authors Guild is suing because no one consulted the authors.
As Kevin alluded to, the money for Google is in the advertising so there must be high volume to justify ads. While Kevin is skeptical of research supporting any such sustained effort, Google has a history of making money where no one has gone before. If they think they see a market, I'd bet on them.
And I'll bet they figure a way to fairly compensate authors which is better than libraries do.

 

Latest

T. C. McCarthy wins Compton Crook Award
05-24 - News
The King's Blood by Daniel Abraham
05-23 - Book Review
BLACKOUT by Mira Grant
05-22 - Book Review
Invincible by Jack Campbell
05-15 - Book Review
The Science of Avatar by Stephen Baxter
05-14 - Book Review
Scourge of the Betrayer by Jeff Salyards
05-08 - Book Review
Scourge of the Betrayer by Jeff Salyards
05-08 - Book Review
Scourge of the Betrayer by Jeff Salyards
05-08 - Book Review
Scourge of the Betrayer by Jeff Salyards
05-08 - Book Review
Odd John by Olaf Stapledon
05-06 - Book Review
Jack Campbell Interview Part 1
05-02 - Interview
Jack Campbell Interview Part 1
05-02 - Interview
Jack Campbell Interview Part 1
05-02 - Interview
The Age of Odin by James Lovegrove
05-01 - Book Review
Fire by Kristin Cashore
04-30 - Book Review
Interview with Jeff Salyards
04-24 - Interview
Fuzzy Nation by John Scalzi
04-24 - Book Review
Bloody Red Baron, The by Kim Newman
04-22 - Book Review
Caine's Law by Matthew Woodring Stover
04-17 - Book Review
New Gemmell Book Announced
04-16 - News
Strangeness and Charm by Mike Shevdon
04-16 - Book Review
Company of the Dead by David Kowalski
04-14 - Book Review
Girl Genius Omnibus, Volume One: Agatha Awakens by Phil and Kaja Foglio
04-10 - Book Review
Stark's War by Jack Campbell
04-10 - Book Review
David Gemmell Award 2012 Short List
04-08 - News
Interview with Kim Newman
04-06 - Interview
Titanic SF
04-05 - Article
Range of Ghosts by Elizabeth Bear
04-03 - Book Review
Forged in Fire by J.A. Pitts
04-02 - Book Review
Alchemist of Souls by Anne Lyle
04-01 - Book Review

New Forum Posts




About - Advertising - Contact us - RSS - For Authors & Publishers - Contribute / Submit - Privacy Policy - Community Login
Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use. The contents of this webpage are copyright © 1997-2011 sffworld.com. All Rights Reserved.