Home Literature Stories Movies Games Comics Blogs News Discussion Forum Art Gallery
  Science Fiction and Fantasy News
T. C. McCarthy wins Compton Crook Award (05-24)
New Gemmell Book Announced (04-16)
David Gemmell Award 2012 Short List (04-08)
EDGE LIT Event, Derby (UK) (03-15)

Official sffworld Reviews
The King's Blood by Daniel Abraham (05-23 - Book)
BLACKOUT by Mira Grant (05-22 - Book)
Invincible by Jack Campbell (05-15 - Book)
The Science of Avatar by Stephen Baxter (05-14 - Book)


Site Index

    Bookmark and Share


View Full Version :

Is this grammatically correct?


Pages : [1] 2

brendaltc
July 18th, 2007, 09:36 AM
Hi,

I found your forum when googling for a place to find assistance with grammar issues. I am trying to discern whether or not the following multiple choice question is grammatically correct:

Of which of the following actions were Samuel's sons guilty?
A. Turning aside after dishonest gain
B. Perverting justice
C. Accepting bribes
D. All of the above

Any assistance anyone might offer would be much appreciated!

Brenda

lin
July 18th, 2007, 10:06 AM
That's not a grammar question, it's to see if we read the thing about Samuel.

(You little cheater):)

Sponsor ads
brendaltc
July 18th, 2007, 10:38 AM
Ha - you caught me! ;)

Actually, I'm helping author a study guide, and each author is to review the work of another author. My reviewer believed this to be grammatically incorrect and I'm not sure that it's wrong. He provided a suggested re-wording, and it's fine, but I'm still not completely convinced that my original is wrong.

So... I went looking for some experts and landed here.

Dawnstorm
July 18th, 2007, 11:18 AM
I don't see any faulty grammar. What's the criticism?

brendaltc
July 18th, 2007, 11:33 AM
He didn't say - just reworded it in a way that's different but not, IMHO, more grammatically correct.

___________________________________
Samuel's sons were guilty of
A. turning aside after dishonest gain.
B. perverting justice.
C. accepting bribes.
D. All of the above


(I’m sure you’re familiar with Winston Churchill on prepositions: http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/churchill.html)
____________________________________
I wasn't sure if he included the Churchill reference as a joke, or because he thought I was going overboard so as not to violate prepositional rules... or exactly what his intention was.

Dawnstorm
July 18th, 2007, 11:54 AM
He didn't say - just reworded it in a way that's different but not, IMHO, more grammatically correct.

___________________________________
Samuel's sons were guilty of
A. turning aside after dishonest gain.
B. perverting justice.
C. accepting bribes.
D. All of the above


(I’m sure you’re familiar with Winston Churchill on prepositions: http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/churchill.html)
____________________________________
I wasn't sure if he included the Churchill reference as a joke, or because he thought I was going overboard so as not to violate prepositional rules... or exactly what his intention was.

Oh, I see.

1. Yes, your sentence is grammatically correct.

2. So would have been: "Which of the following sentences were Samuel's sons guilty of?" (But you might get into problems with traditionalists.)

3. The Churchill quote is common to denounce traditionalist dislike of sentences that end with prepositions. (Churhill's sentence is rather complex; the discussions involve phrasal verbs and adverbial prepositions etc. It's not really important, here.)

4. The re-wording of your sentence doesn't concern the prepositions at all. Your version has a complete question with participial phrases for an answer, whereas the re-worded question has half a sentence that the students are supposed to complete. (There is no sentence that ends with a preposition; Churchill is irrelevant.)

5. I do prefer, stylistically, the reworded option, but having a complete question may fit better with your concept. It's okay to start with the "of which", but I'd prefer to put the "of" to the end to avoid "of which of".

In summary, there's no grammatical mistake concerning prepositions in your original sentence. It's a matter of stylistics. (Both the prepositional issue, and the rewrite.)

brendaltc
July 18th, 2007, 12:41 PM
Thanks! That helps a lot!

I agree that as a stand-alone, stylistically, his is preferable. This question is found in the midst of many other questions, and the feeling of auditory redundancy that comes amidst drill and practice of similarly styled questions puts kids to sleep... so this question kind of helped "mix it up" in the context of the complete document.

Thanks again! I appreciate the perspective!

lin
July 18th, 2007, 03:27 PM
Another good comment on the dread final preposition appears (in one of it's versions) in the movie "Thick As Thieves".

The cops are are rousting some street boyz and one of them says:

Where you coming from?

A cop tells him he's ignorant and shouldn't end a sentence with a preposition like "from".

Street Crime replies: Okay, Where you coming from, mother****er?

Arash
July 18th, 2007, 09:13 PM
This isn't your English homework, is it? :D

Dawnstorm
July 19th, 2007, 01:13 AM
Another good comment on the dread final preposition appears (in one of it's versions) in the movie "Thick As Thieves".

The cops are are rousting some street boyz and one of them says:

Where you coming from?

A cop tells him he's ignorant and shouldn't end a sentence with a preposition like "from".

Street Crime replies: Okay, Where you coming from, mother****er?

Ooh, that's a good one. :D

 

Latest

T. C. McCarthy wins Compton Crook Award
05-24 - News
The King's Blood by Daniel Abraham
05-23 - Book Review
BLACKOUT by Mira Grant
05-22 - Book Review
Invincible by Jack Campbell
05-15 - Book Review
The Science of Avatar by Stephen Baxter
05-14 - Book Review
Scourge of the Betrayer by Jeff Salyards
05-08 - Book Review
Scourge of the Betrayer by Jeff Salyards
05-08 - Book Review
Scourge of the Betrayer by Jeff Salyards
05-08 - Book Review
Scourge of the Betrayer by Jeff Salyards
05-08 - Book Review
Odd John by Olaf Stapledon
05-06 - Book Review
Jack Campbell Interview Part 1
05-02 - Interview
Jack Campbell Interview Part 1
05-02 - Interview
Jack Campbell Interview Part 1
05-02 - Interview
The Age of Odin by James Lovegrove
05-01 - Book Review
Fire by Kristin Cashore
04-30 - Book Review
Interview with Jeff Salyards
04-24 - Interview
Fuzzy Nation by John Scalzi
04-24 - Book Review
Bloody Red Baron, The by Kim Newman
04-22 - Book Review
Caine's Law by Matthew Woodring Stover
04-17 - Book Review
New Gemmell Book Announced
04-16 - News
Strangeness and Charm by Mike Shevdon
04-16 - Book Review
Company of the Dead by David Kowalski
04-14 - Book Review
Girl Genius Omnibus, Volume One: Agatha Awakens by Phil and Kaja Foglio
04-10 - Book Review
Stark's War by Jack Campbell
04-10 - Book Review
David Gemmell Award 2012 Short List
04-08 - News
Interview with Kim Newman
04-06 - Interview
Titanic SF
04-05 - Article
Range of Ghosts by Elizabeth Bear
04-03 - Book Review
Forged in Fire by J.A. Pitts
04-02 - Book Review
Alchemist of Souls by Anne Lyle
04-01 - Book Review

New Forum Posts




About - Advertising - Contact us - RSS - For Authors & Publishers - Contribute / Submit - Privacy Policy - Community Login
Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use. The contents of this webpage are copyright © 1997-2011 sffworld.com. All Rights Reserved.