Takoren
March 29th, 2008, 10:03 PM
I'm a fairly recent Feist reader and I thought I'd begin at the beginning and read his first series before buying any of the others. As things stand, I don't think I'll be reading past A Darkness at Sethanon, but despite that, I have to ask:
Why do people seem to hate Silverthorn so much? I'm a bit more than halfway through it right now and I'm really enjoying it. It's really just a straightforward action/adventure tale, but I've come to realize in recent years that there's really nothing wrong with that. It's fun and the threat seems very real. I really like Arutha as a protagonist (he was one of my favorite characters in Magician), plus Jimmy is a great character, and Laurie and Martin are really coming into their own.
On the other hand, I thought that there was a lot lacking about Magician. It seemed that Feist wanted to write a high-toned war epic before he was really ready to. There was a lot to like about it, but there were some aspects that annoyed me, particularly the sudden time-jumps (Within one chapter three years go by, then three paragraphs later we've moved on yet another year). Overall I think I liked it, but it certainly isn't my favorite, and I'm enjoying Silverthorn a little more, I think. Certainly on a different level. I think Magician was just okay as a harsh, heavier wartime tale while Silverthorn is first-class as a lighter adventure yarn.
But I keep hearing "it's all downhill after Magician" or "If you're gonna read Feist, read Magician and then stop there."
Are there any others who share this view of Silverthorn? Or perhaps the second half is where it starts to suck?
Why do people seem to hate Silverthorn so much? I'm a bit more than halfway through it right now and I'm really enjoying it. It's really just a straightforward action/adventure tale, but I've come to realize in recent years that there's really nothing wrong with that. It's fun and the threat seems very real. I really like Arutha as a protagonist (he was one of my favorite characters in Magician), plus Jimmy is a great character, and Laurie and Martin are really coming into their own.
On the other hand, I thought that there was a lot lacking about Magician. It seemed that Feist wanted to write a high-toned war epic before he was really ready to. There was a lot to like about it, but there were some aspects that annoyed me, particularly the sudden time-jumps (Within one chapter three years go by, then three paragraphs later we've moved on yet another year). Overall I think I liked it, but it certainly isn't my favorite, and I'm enjoying Silverthorn a little more, I think. Certainly on a different level. I think Magician was just okay as a harsh, heavier wartime tale while Silverthorn is first-class as a lighter adventure yarn.
But I keep hearing "it's all downhill after Magician" or "If you're gonna read Feist, read Magician and then stop there."
Are there any others who share this view of Silverthorn? Or perhaps the second half is where it starts to suck?

