View Full Version :
Caliban
November 13th, 2001, 04:47 PM
A friend of mine just recently recommended David Gemmel's "Drenai Saga."
Could someone fill me in? I am not really familiar with his work.
Thanks a lot.
Lord Soth
November 13th, 2001, 11:01 PM
Short and sweet is the best way to describe Gemmel i think. He's one of my favorite authors. Quick paced and moving.
Well worth checking out.
Cannon Fodder
November 13th, 2001, 11:39 PM
It's an on going series of stand alone novels in a harsh medieval world, though there are some recurring characters such as Druss and Waylander the Slayer. Quick paced and gritty. I would recommend them, especially Legend and Waylander, which would both be good to start with.
James Barclay
November 14th, 2001, 12:52 AM
Gemmell is a top writer, in my opionion and the Drenai saga were the first of his I read. Enjoyed the lot. Both Waylander and Druss are characters to be enjoyed.
And, if you fancy a change from heroic fantasy after them but still want Gemmell, try out The Jon Shannow books. They are excellent.
One of my all time favourite writers.
Caliban
November 14th, 2001, 04:05 AM
Thanks a lot! I am still in the midst of GRRM, but I'll definitely check Gemmel out on those reviews.
Eventine
November 15th, 2001, 02:29 PM
I will put in a dissenting view...
I didn't enjoy it. The characters were extremely two dimensional, and the writing style was a little hard to follow. It is quite strange to see two sequential paragraphs from different characters view points. The plot was extremely simple and that interesting.
This was in Legend. Not sure if any of his other stuf is worth reading. I wouldn't try it unless it had a really strong recommendation.
mundanemies
November 16th, 2001, 11:52 AM
Two-dimensional?
More like four-dimensional to me. The fact is that Gemmell writes of the same character, which is probably his biggest weakness. Reading his books back to back soon gets far too repetative. Yet time and againg, over and over, he manages to weave a Great tale and fully-dimensional maincharacters and interesting supporting ones.
To call Legend's plot simple and (probably, as I think you may have missed a word here) not very interesting is weird. Yes, the plot is very simple, but far from un-interesting. Legend is a jam-packed action galore with deep and emotional meanderings of loyalty, loss and bravery. Druss is an archetype of gigantic proportions; a loner, guilt-ridden man full of vengeange. Gemmell's heroes are almost always like that, a figure that owes a LOT to Ethan Edwards. Ethan Who?
Of The Searchers, probably the greatest western ever made, starring John Wayne as Druss... That'd been a day!
Gilliam
November 17th, 2001, 09:17 PM
Read Druss you won't be disappointed while people can argue that the plot is simple I believe that the story is worth reading due to the fact that the plot is "simple". The main story is about a man searching for his lost love and discovering that he is an unstoppable fighting machine.
Eventine
November 20th, 2001, 07:15 AM
<quote>Druss is an archetype of gigantic proportions </quote>
He is also a two dimensional, predictable stereotypical character. I shouldn't have to read every Gemmel book for him to be fleshed out.
I won't deny that the plot is full of action, but is it interesting? No. It is mindless fight after fight, and is very predictable. IMO, these books are only slightly above those horrible Forgotten Realms novels.
JohnH
November 20th, 2001, 12:21 PM
I find Gemmell to be like snack food. Nothing to make a meal on but certainly fare to tide you over. Certainly I would take Gemmell over the likes of Feist, Brooks, Weis/Hickman just to mention a few that many here dine on regularly.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.