phil_geo
April 11th, 2010, 03:01 PM
The short story nominees for the 2010 Hugo Award have been published online as usual. They are available to read for free.
Links to each story: http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2010/04/finalists-2010-hugo-awards-and-john-w-campbell-award-nominees/
Here's my opinion:
• “The Bride of Frankenstein”, Mike Resnick (Asimov’s 12/09)
I don't want to be too harsh, but Mike Resnick should not keep getting nominated every year. This year's entry is weak - I really don't see anything that stands out. Interestingly, it has the same romantic sappy feel as the last couple year's winners, but I don't think it has the strength of characters or even plot. Probably the weakest entry.
• “Bridesicle”, Will McIntosh (Asimov’s 1/09)
I found this very orignal, and it also has the same romantic story angle. However, the concept and complexity just blows away "The Bride of Frankenstein". The creepy premise is especially creepy because I could see it happening.
• “The Moment”, Lawrence M. Schoen (Footprints; Hadley Rille Books)
The writing here is phenomenal, but hard to get through. Two readings at a minimum is required, and who does that anymore? Another very original story with a lot of worldbuilding that reminds me a little of Startide Rising. Enough here for a novel.
• “Non-Zero Probabilities”, N.K. Jemisin (Clarkesworld 9/09)
An original idea, but not much more. The writing is average and the you never eally empathize with the characters. I enjoyed it but it's not that strong.
• “Spar”, Kij Johnson (Clarkesworld 10/09)
A crazy, very disturbing story. I found myself very interested in what happens, and a little disappointed with the ending. Overall, I thought this was a great story even though reading it bothered me a little. Johnson definitely achieves an emotional response, and without currying cheap sympathy.
My final guess? Should win: The Moment. Will Win: Bridesicle.
Links to each story: http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2010/04/finalists-2010-hugo-awards-and-john-w-campbell-award-nominees/
Here's my opinion:
• “The Bride of Frankenstein”, Mike Resnick (Asimov’s 12/09)
I don't want to be too harsh, but Mike Resnick should not keep getting nominated every year. This year's entry is weak - I really don't see anything that stands out. Interestingly, it has the same romantic sappy feel as the last couple year's winners, but I don't think it has the strength of characters or even plot. Probably the weakest entry.
• “Bridesicle”, Will McIntosh (Asimov’s 1/09)
I found this very orignal, and it also has the same romantic story angle. However, the concept and complexity just blows away "The Bride of Frankenstein". The creepy premise is especially creepy because I could see it happening.
• “The Moment”, Lawrence M. Schoen (Footprints; Hadley Rille Books)
The writing here is phenomenal, but hard to get through. Two readings at a minimum is required, and who does that anymore? Another very original story with a lot of worldbuilding that reminds me a little of Startide Rising. Enough here for a novel.
• “Non-Zero Probabilities”, N.K. Jemisin (Clarkesworld 9/09)
An original idea, but not much more. The writing is average and the you never eally empathize with the characters. I enjoyed it but it's not that strong.
• “Spar”, Kij Johnson (Clarkesworld 10/09)
A crazy, very disturbing story. I found myself very interested in what happens, and a little disappointed with the ending. Overall, I thought this was a great story even though reading it bothered me a little. Johnson definitely achieves an emotional response, and without currying cheap sympathy.
My final guess? Should win: The Moment. Will Win: Bridesicle.

