Home Literature Stories Movies Games Comics Blogs News Discussion Forum Art Gallery
  Science Fiction and Fantasy News
T. C. McCarthy wins Compton Crook Award (05-24)
New Gemmell Book Announced (04-16)
David Gemmell Award 2012 Short List (04-08)
EDGE LIT Event, Derby (UK) (03-15)

Official sffworld Reviews
The King's Blood by Daniel Abraham (05-23 - Book)
BLACKOUT by Mira Grant (05-22 - Book)
Invincible by Jack Campbell (05-15 - Book)
The Science of Avatar by Stephen Baxter (05-14 - Book)


Site Index

    Bookmark and Share


View Full Version :

Another copyright issue?


touchwood
August 17th, 2001, 01:00 AM
I have come across the term ‘ not the mode of expression of the story ‘ relating to copyrigt and wonder what this really means.

If I write a story about a goldfish swimming in a bowl and it bumps into things inside the bowl, say a rock, and a swordfish the reader of this story can imagine all sorts of inferences. I have copyright of this story once published. Copyright must however be lodged or I cannot stop (sue) anyone from copying it.

Here comes the question. If someone re-writes the story FROM THE POINT OF VIEWS of the goldfish and the swordfish the rewite doesn’t infringe my copyright (I believe)

Why?

Well, my story was my expression of my idea of the goldfish bumping into the rock and the swordfish. My expression - copyright 2 me.

The rewrite was a totally different expression of my original ‘idea’ which cannot be copyrighted.

Am I correct?

Yuk!

regards

touchwood

touchwood
August 17th, 2001, 01:06 AM
Sorry, please change the ending of my last sentence from 'cannot be copyrighted' to 'doesn't infringe MY original copyright.' (this box a bit small, will compose off-line, check and post in future!)

Sponsor ads
Erebus
August 17th, 2001, 01:22 AM
As I understand it, Touchwood, you cannot copyright an idea in relation to writing. However, copyright for your work is automatic in most countries, usually for the term of the author's life plus 50 years. You can also register your copyright, something which certainly does seem necessary in the US, given the increasing tide of the litigious culture its lawers have perpetuated! http://www.sffworld.com/ubb/smile.gif

Usually though, being able to prove you are the owner and creator of the work is sufficient, I think.

In relation to ideas, I think copyright is more concerned with outright plagiarism, which must be true, given the number of similar-themed novels out there! Of course, this is completely different to a patented idea for a product etc. where ideas can certainly be protected by law.

Erebus
August 22nd, 2001, 08:38 PM
Here's some info I found that may prove useful to anone interested. This applies to US copyright only:

Obtaining a federal copyright is basically an insurance policy for your work. Copyright protection arises automatically the moment the author fixes the work in a tangible form (i.e. when a writer writes her story), without the author having to do anything. So why copyright your work if you're automatically protected?

1. Registration establishes a public record of your copyright and puts everyone in the world on notice of your copyright.

2. You cannot sue somebody for copyright infringement until you have registered your work with the Copyright Office.

3. No award for statutory damages or attorneys fees will be made for any infringement of a copyright in an unpublished work which occurs prior to registration of the copyright. The same holds true for published works, unless the registration is made within three months after the first publication.

4. If the registration of your work is done within five years from its creation, it is considered prima facie evidence in court. Prima facie evidence means that if you ever went to court, the registration of your copyright would be sufficient evidence of your ownership of the copyrighted material. The only way for another party to win would be for them to present evidence showing:

that they had a pre-existing copyright claim to the work.

that you permitted them to use your work.

that you didn't actually create the work.

that you stole it from them.

More info can be found here:
www.clickandcopyright.com (http://www.clickandcopyright.com)

 

Latest

T. C. McCarthy wins Compton Crook Award
05-24 - News
The King's Blood by Daniel Abraham
05-23 - Book Review
BLACKOUT by Mira Grant
05-22 - Book Review
Invincible by Jack Campbell
05-15 - Book Review
The Science of Avatar by Stephen Baxter
05-14 - Book Review
Scourge of the Betrayer by Jeff Salyards
05-08 - Book Review
Scourge of the Betrayer by Jeff Salyards
05-08 - Book Review
Scourge of the Betrayer by Jeff Salyards
05-08 - Book Review
Scourge of the Betrayer by Jeff Salyards
05-08 - Book Review
Odd John by Olaf Stapledon
05-06 - Book Review
Jack Campbell Interview Part 1
05-02 - Interview
Jack Campbell Interview Part 1
05-02 - Interview
Jack Campbell Interview Part 1
05-02 - Interview
The Age of Odin by James Lovegrove
05-01 - Book Review
Fire by Kristin Cashore
04-30 - Book Review
Interview with Jeff Salyards
04-24 - Interview
Fuzzy Nation by John Scalzi
04-24 - Book Review
Bloody Red Baron, The by Kim Newman
04-22 - Book Review
Caine's Law by Matthew Woodring Stover
04-17 - Book Review
New Gemmell Book Announced
04-16 - News
Strangeness and Charm by Mike Shevdon
04-16 - Book Review
Company of the Dead by David Kowalski
04-14 - Book Review
Girl Genius Omnibus, Volume One: Agatha Awakens by Phil and Kaja Foglio
04-10 - Book Review
Stark's War by Jack Campbell
04-10 - Book Review
David Gemmell Award 2012 Short List
04-08 - News
Interview with Kim Newman
04-06 - Interview
Titanic SF
04-05 - Article
Range of Ghosts by Elizabeth Bear
04-03 - Book Review
Forged in Fire by J.A. Pitts
04-02 - Book Review
Alchemist of Souls by Anne Lyle
04-01 - Book Review

New Forum Posts




About - Advertising - Contact us - RSS - For Authors & Publishers - Contribute / Submit - Privacy Policy - Community Login
Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use. The contents of this webpage are copyright © 1997-2011 sffworld.com. All Rights Reserved.