knivesout
June 28th, 2004, 02:15 AM
While the debates in the fantasy section seem inherently incapable of any real resolution, they have thrown out a lot of interesting recommendations for work in the genre that is unusual and worthy of notice. I thought it might be a good idea to do the same for SF.
Personally, I am afraid I am rather behind the times when it comes to SF - I am still obsessively catching up with everything ever written in the field since the Golden Age, and have only recently broken through to reading some of the major writers of the 80s!
However, I can cite two writers who are at least doing interesting things within the genre, although I doubt they are in any way as much iconoclasts as some of the off-centre fantasists. Then again SF has always been a rather broad bag of tales.
Adam Roberts: He aspires to a high level of wordcraft, and usually achieves it. His novels are packed with philsophical ideas and some interestng tech-sepc at times, but one real problem is that he can get too abstruse at times, as with the ending of On which seems to have left many readers baffled and even infuriated. He seems to have sidelines into writing spoof-fiction right now, but hopefully will soon pick up the reins on his SF career.
Ken MacLeod: Wayard, witty and rather left-wing. You don't have to agree with any of his politics to admire his deft technological extrapolation, wry, intelligent wit and engaging plots, peopled with fairly intersting characters (although there is a certain MacLeod 'type of hero emerging!).
OK, these are two writers I have managed to notice who seem to be in a position to do interesting things. But I know there are many more - names such as Charles Stross and Paul McAuley have been mentioned elsewhere, for instance.
So tell me more! Who are the young Turks of sf today, the ones pushing this genre we love so well into new spaces?
Personally, I am afraid I am rather behind the times when it comes to SF - I am still obsessively catching up with everything ever written in the field since the Golden Age, and have only recently broken through to reading some of the major writers of the 80s!
However, I can cite two writers who are at least doing interesting things within the genre, although I doubt they are in any way as much iconoclasts as some of the off-centre fantasists. Then again SF has always been a rather broad bag of tales.
Adam Roberts: He aspires to a high level of wordcraft, and usually achieves it. His novels are packed with philsophical ideas and some interestng tech-sepc at times, but one real problem is that he can get too abstruse at times, as with the ending of On which seems to have left many readers baffled and even infuriated. He seems to have sidelines into writing spoof-fiction right now, but hopefully will soon pick up the reins on his SF career.
Ken MacLeod: Wayard, witty and rather left-wing. You don't have to agree with any of his politics to admire his deft technological extrapolation, wry, intelligent wit and engaging plots, peopled with fairly intersting characters (although there is a certain MacLeod 'type of hero emerging!).
OK, these are two writers I have managed to notice who seem to be in a position to do interesting things. But I know there are many more - names such as Charles Stross and Paul McAuley have been mentioned elsewhere, for instance.
So tell me more! Who are the young Turks of sf today, the ones pushing this genre we love so well into new spaces?

