August 31st, 2006, 09:01 PM #1
September '06 SF BOTM: Downbelow Station by C.J. Cherryh
Discussion is now open for Downbelow Station. Odo, who nominated the book has contributed some questions to kick us off. As always, these are only a starting point. Feel free to discuss any and all things that occurred to you in your reading of this Hugo winner.
1) "Downbelow station" is set during a war, but we (almost) never witness the battles, only their consequences. What do you think about this way of telling the story? Would you have liked the book more if it the focus was like that of more typical Space Opera with lots of explosions?
2) There are many different characters in the story. Which one was your favourite? Which one did you like the least?
3) What do you think of the process of "Adjustment," both morally and from a story-telling perspective?
4) Have you read any other Cherryh's books set in the Alliance-Union universe? If not, are you planning to read any?
5) C. J. Cherryh is well-known for her aliens. How did you find the Downers as an alien race? How important was their alien-ness to the overall story?
August 31st, 2006, 09:34 PM #2
I'm still only about halfway through this but I'll take a stab
1) I hadn't thought of it specifically that way, but it is interesting. After all, unless you personally are a soldier in the war, chances are you won't see the explody stuff.
2) It is a bit confusing with all the characters at first. This book NEEDS a character listing/dramatis personae type of thing. ESPECIALLY with multiple intelligent species.
4) No bit there is a strong possibility I will.
5) Speech patterns are the most notable things right now, but like I said, I'm only halfway through.
September 1st, 2006, 03:19 AM #3
There has been a postal strike here for a while so I'm still waiting for my copy to arrive.
September 1st, 2006, 07:04 AM #4
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- St. Helens: home of the world's greatest RL team
I think it’s an enjoyable, if somewhat trivial piece of SF. Cherryh has an easily consumed fast-paced style that lends itself to long-haul periods of reading without much effort. That said, she does posses a rather odd appreciation of (especially parenthetical) comma usage, which suggests to me that she doesn’t grasp the difference between them and full stops.
The pace is that of space opera, but the literary devices, narrative techniques etc. she deploys seem more reminiscent of the disaster genre, or the WWII epic.
Her characters have an acceptable level of depth and at several points show considerable complexity (I’m thinking of the bit where Elene, shocked by the loss of her family, begs Damon for a baby).
Downbelow Station, as well of most of Cherryh’s catalogue for that matter, seems to draw quite heavily from the grimy, oil-soaked, roughneck and cynical world of Ridley Scott’s Alien (man-sized air vents are held to be a given in space!), where corporations have evolved into monolithic interplanetary powers with scant regard to human considerations. I think Cherryh’s carved out something of a niche in this field of ‘techno-speak savvy’ and I suspect she’s influenced quite a number of contemporary writers.
It’s interesting that she pitches herself between the culturally stagnant Earth (considered bad) and the autocratic Union (considered worse), siding with the pioneering and liberal (in the traditional sense) settlers, who are held to be at the forefront of human progress. Indeed, the novel references several key elements of American history, most notably those in the nation's formative years. The trek West by the early settlers; the “boom times” of cow town; the sense of loss as interstellar travel renders station life pointless, which mirrors the railway’s destruction of the Old West; the conflict between white America and the Indians is represented in spades on the Downer world (“Don’t insult me with any Downer’s word!”) etc.
I think the Union (and its snivelling, morally corrupt allies – the Lukas family) seems like a bit of a set-em-up-and-knock-em-down enemy. They use torture. They’re grown in vats. They reek of Aryan supermen. They’re fanatics etc. It’s all pretty unsophisticated and puerile stuff that undermines proceedings considerably. Cherryh should have known better.
I’m still trying to discover why the diplomacy of the future should take place through the language and mannerisms of Victorian Britain.
On the issue of military might and the power of the military as political kingmakers Cherryh hits closer to the mark. The company space-carrier captains are straight from the pages of The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. They’re old-style Roman provincial commanders with loyalties only to themselves and the power to dictate government at the muzzle end of a gun. I found the political machinations between Signy and Mazian pretty interesting.
Downbelow Station's biggest problems are its two primary representations of difference: mindwipe and the Downers. The possibilities for exploring the ramifications of personality adjustment/reconstruction are pretty limitless. But Cherryh never really gets beyond first base with Talley. Talley strikes me as a fascinating beginning that never progresses. It’s almost as if Cherryh got cold feet or lost her nerve halfway through the novel. By the time I’d finished I wasn’t sure whether the procedure had had any effect on Talley.
Cherryh gets a bit further with the touchy-feely Downers, but not much. The cliché of humans reminded of their humanity by aliens was running close to flatline in the fifties. There’s no real attempt to explore the mysteries of Downer culture, society, philosophy etc. They’re cute (with big teddy bear eyes) and sentimental and they say ‘love you’ (nauseatingly) a lot and … well … that’s about it. ‘The humans were infected with the hisa’s trust’ – please God, no!
Without significant exploration of its two key concepts the book kind of dissolves into something unsatisfactory. Enjoyable – but lacking real sophistication and depth.
Last edited by Mugwump; September 1st, 2006 at 08:13 AM.
September 2nd, 2006, 06:17 PM #5
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Birmingham, AL
I found this book very entertaining, and put it in the "almost great" category.
I felt that both Mallory and Talley's were characters with great potential that didn't quite get there (and their relationship for that matter).
I felt that the downers were reasonably interesting, but not strikingly nonhuman in the way that the most fascinating scifi aliens are. They are a lot like wimpy humans with a twist, "little guys" who naturally enough the good people want to protect and the bad people want to exploit. The conclusion of downer storyline could have been much more effective.
Still, I gave it an 8/10.
September 2nd, 2006, 08:14 PM #6
Cherryh lost me at about the halfway point, I hate to admit. I shouldn't be surprised, since her Dreaming Tree was less than entertaining. I might have to redact my statement about trying more of her books, I've tried twice and lost steam around the midpoint.
Her style, I found a bit off-putting. It seemed as if sentences were abruptly ended or begun in the middle.
There were alot of characters and like I said, a list of characters really would have helped. I admit to being confused at times, especially when pages of dialogue go pass and it we only see "he said" on the entire page rather than "Lukas said," once in a while.
I'm especially let down, on the whole, because I wanted to read and like this book for a while, but it just didn't connect with me sufficiently.
Last edited by Rob B; September 3rd, 2006 at 09:42 AM.
September 3rd, 2006, 02:06 AM #7
I'm about three chapters in now and have the feeling that I'm missing something. To me the book is close to unreadable, the style, is, unbelieveable, with so much, punctuation,,,,the first 30 pages have been mind-numbingly dull - does it improve suddenly? I'm not sure how much more of my life I can give over to this book...
Last edited by Ropie; September 3rd, 2006 at 02:09 AM.
September 3rd, 2006, 07:25 AM #8
I started this book a few weeks ago, but stopped about halfway through. I'll finish one day, but only because i want to read Cyteen eventually.
The characters i'm not ifnding memorable (I've forgotten all the names already), and I had no interest in whatever war was going on - few of the characters were shown to feel strongly either way, so nor did I.
Also, I had heard Cherryh's use of aliens was inventive or special, but in this case they were very typical humanoids, with unappealing care bear attributes.
I didn't notice the writing being particularly bad, and i have vague memories of enjoying Rimrunners, so i think it is the plot and characters that put me off here. Too slow and boring.
Did anyone else get the feeling from the first half that the book could have been set in an airport in the real world? How boring is that? A bit like watching one of those Airport documentaries showing the daily crises, but without the zany, desperate to be on TV characters.
September 3rd, 2006, 01:44 PM #9
I'm throwing in the towel..Originally Posted by Yobmod
Last edited by Ropie; September 3rd, 2006 at 01:50 PM.
September 3rd, 2006, 01:44 PM #10
Do you have to read this to read Cyteen?
September 3rd, 2006, 01:54 PM #11Originally Posted by ArthurFrayn
September 3rd, 2006, 03:47 PM #12
Do you have to read this to read Cyteen?
- Join Date
- Jul 2001
- Hobbit Towers, England
- Blog Entries
There are a few of Cherryh's books that use the same set up (Merchanter series/Alliance/Union) though are standalone: 4000 in Gehenna, for one.
September 3rd, 2006, 08:39 PM #13
Well, I have Cyteen, so I guess my first shot at Cherryh will be a drop right into the deep end of the pool!
Glad to hear it's not reliant on the other books. I hate when I pick up the middle or the end books in a series first.
September 3rd, 2006, 09:11 PM #14
Not that I'm happy at other people's misfortunes, but I'm relieved I wasn't the only one who had such difficulties with the book.
September 4th, 2006, 03:40 AM #15Originally Posted by Rob B
I don't want to come across as being a lazy reader just because I didn't like the book. I read nothing else but this for three days and reread two chapters twice. Had I not had so many other things to read and do this month I may have persevered.
To answer the questions:
1. When I read this question I was quite interested as I am not a fan of graphic authorial representations of battle scenes because they just don't interest me unless the author is very capable and knows how to write them extremely well. I tend to like books where external events deeply affect a plot and are only shown by their consequences (A Canticle for Leibowitz is an example that springs to mind) - it gives a sense of believable grandeur, of larger forces at work. Unfortunately I found Cherryh's descriptions of these consequences virtually impossible to follow.
2. I only saw the characters here as names, I didn't have time to get interested in one of them. Usually don't appreciate it when books have too many characters though.
3. No, and on the strength of this, definitely not.
Last edited by Ropie; September 4th, 2006 at 03:52 AM.