Results 1 to 15 of 81

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    I like to rock the party Corporal Blues's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    962

    Kingdoms of Thorn and Bone

    Hey all,

    Has anyone read the Kingdoms of Thorne and Bone series by Greg Keyes?

    If so did you like it? What is the buzz on it?

    I heard it was "Martin-Lite"

    Thanks for your time

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Vancouver, B.C., Canada
    Posts
    338
    Martin-lite sums it up very nicely...

  3. #3
    El-Prawno
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    sydney aus
    Posts
    842
    IMO, it's pretty deep fantasy, but it's also 'clean' and not too complicated. Not as good as Erikson/Bakker/Martin, but definitely at the tier below.

  4. #4
    Lord of the Wild Hunt Mithfânion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Holland
    Posts
    3,380
    Average work. I read the Briar King and thought it was mediocre, but I had already bought Charnel Prince and hoped it would be more thrilling. It wasn't. There isn't one category in which Keyes really excells in my opinion. The plot is very stop and run, stop and run. The characters are detailed but none of them is interesting to me, they are like charicatures. Worldbuilding like this we have seen many times before. Overall rating: 6 out of 10.

  5. #5
    I like candy SteveF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    164
    Really good IMO. I thought the world building and sense of history and mystery in the Briar King was excellent. Charnel Prince didn't reach quite the same heights but was still hugely enjoyable.

    I've seen a few suggestions that it is sub-Martin. People can have their own opinions, but for me this is a fairly meaningless comparison. As far as I am concerned, the series is, so far, excellent fantasy.

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    64
    One of the reasons I enjoy this series is that it is "lite" in the sense that you get the same thing from Keyes in 400 pages that it would take Martin 800 pages to write. The plot is much more focused, and the books are generally free of all the extra baggage you get in the bricks delivered by guys like Erikson, Jordan and Martin. But if you enjoy all those details, you may not like Kingdoms of Thorn and Bone.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Nightsorrow View Post
    IMO, it's pretty deep fantasy, but it's also 'clean' and not too complicated. Not as good as Erikson/Bakker/Martin, but definitely at the tier below.
    I like the clean and uncomplicated remark, that certainly rings true with me.

    While the first two books i've read aren't anything special, they are reliably good reads. The characters I found engaging, they wern't too complexly introduced, or spurting any dense philosophy, or proving to be arduos to read about. The story was the standard ancient evil device, plus the usual politics, mad relatives, that sort of thing.

    I'm with Physics Knight, in that it had me flipping the pages. I think this is simply because its a steady and adventurous, decently written few books.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •