View Poll Results: Hardcover vs. Paperback?

Voters
125. You may not vote on this poll
  • Hardcover

    42 33.60%
  • Paperback

    83 66.40%
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 73

Thread: Hardcover vs. Paperback?

  1. #1

    Hardcover vs. Paperback?

    Hi all, just a had a quickie question. I just started reading fantasy maybe bout a year or more ago. I have read all the Tolkien books, also A song of Ice and Fire and some other good ones I got based on recommendations on these forums

    Anyway, I was wondering what type of books you all prefer, Hardcover or paperback. Most of the books I have bought are hardcover. No particular reason I guess, I just think they look nicer. Only drawback is they take up more room then paperback obviously.

  2. #2
    I like what I like... Richardb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    1,092
    Nothing looks better than a few hundred hardbacks lined up on the bookshelves...
    But, sometimes you gotta also buy the paperback to carry to work, on planes, etc...

  3. #3
    I prefer to read a hardback- but the problem is that theyre very expensive and take up a lot of space. So, I buy paperback, except for when new books in series I like come out and for history books.

  4. #4
    I like spaceships cougs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Hamburg, NY
    Posts
    172
    As far as reading goes, I prefer trade paperbacks over hardcover. They have the same quality paper as a hardback, but they open up easily, making them a joy to read (imo), and look really nice on a shelf.

    Reading:
    1st - Trade/Quality/Large paperback
    2nd - Mass Market
    3rd - Hardcover

    Collecting:
    1st - Leather
    2nd - Trade/Quality/Large Paperback
    3rd - Hardcover/Library
    4th - Mass Market

  5. #5
    A servant of Lord Arioch FitzChivalry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    1,354
    I usually read mass market paperback, mostly because they are cheaper, but also because they fit on my shelf better.
    I don't understand though why some books get stuck in the Trade Paperback stage and never get to mass market, books of authors like Jeff Vandermeer, Patricia Mckillip, Jeffrey Ford, Jeffrey E. Barlough and many others. Talking about the US market where i do most of my purchases, some of those can be found in the british equivalent of mass market paperback in the UK.

  6. #6
    Administrator Administrator Hobbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Hobbit Towers, England
    Posts
    11,363
    Blog Entries
    126
    Old topic!

    Earlier discussion HERE and HERE.

    (I'm sure I've said there for me it's hardback: but definitely not trade paperback, if I can help it!)

    Hobbit
    Mark

  7. #7
    Paperback for me.. I need to be able to bend the book to hold it comfortably. Hardbacks suck.

  8. #8
    Gryffindor Gal manephelien's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Diagon Alley
    Posts
    267
    Quote Originally Posted by shadow9d9 View Post
    Paperback for me.. I need to be able to bend the book to hold it comfortably. Hardbacks suck.
    I have small hands, so paperbacks are a lot more comfortable to read. They're also quite a bit cheaper than hardbacks. However, if it's a book I really want, I'll buy it in hardcover.

  9. #9
    Prefers to be anomalous intensityxx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,235
    For reading, I prefer ebooks (Sony Reader) for its light weight and so I can adjust the size, font, etc.

    I really hate thick, dark, smashed-together text in mmpbs, and I find that sometimes UK books are the worst offenders. (Doesn't that bother you guys too?)

    Because trade paperbacks often have better vertical spacing, whiter paper, nicer fonts, and lighter weight, I like them the best of physical books.

    I used to prefer hardcovers, but once I became a "mouse potato", my wrists became too sore to hold hardcovers.

  10. #10
    looking for coffee redhead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    201
    Quote Originally Posted by manephelien View Post
    I have small hands, so paperbacks are a lot more comfortable to read. They're also quite a bit cheaper than hardbacks. However, if it's a book I really want, I'll buy it in hardcover.
    ah, so that explains why i love paperbacks over hardbacks! I've got teensy little kid hands!

    oh trade paperbacks, how do i love thee, let me count the ways
    - fits in my purse
    - fits my little kid hands
    - doesn't weigh anything
    - you ever dropped a hardback in the bathtub??

    I get hardbacks from the library, but usually buy paperbacks.

  11. #11
    Administrator Administrator Hobbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Hobbit Towers, England
    Posts
    11,363
    Blog Entries
    126
    trade paperbacks, how do i love thee, let me count the ways
    - fits in my purse
    - fits my little kid hands
    - doesn't weigh anything
    RED: you sure you got that right? If so, your handbag must be huge!

    Trade Paperback - the text block of a Hardback. Same size as a HB, same cover, just not a hardback.

    Mass Market Paperback: the usual paperback. Gets bent, folded bashed. Doesn't handle regular mauling, you know the one...

    Because trade paperbacks often have better vertical spacing, whiter paper, nicer fonts, and lighter weight, I like them the best of physical books.
    Intensity: If only that were true! Quite often here in the UK, Trade Paperback means cheap PB paper in a HB size. All the problems, none of the benefits....

    (Just don't get me started on deckled edges....)

    And if you want books I really love: leather bound, gilt edged.... Easton Press are fabulous!

    Hobbit
    Mark

  12. #12
    Mass Market Paperback, definitely. When I first got really into fantasy (well, just generally any reading that wasn't for school) I was really picky about having all hardcover books because I knew they'd last longer and they look better as well.

    Now I realize that Paperbacks are more my thing. Easier to read, easier to carry, and much cheaper. To me, books are meant to be read, not collected (not to nock those who like collecting books), so I really don't care about the look of them on the shelf at all.

  13. #13
    Paperbacks

    Mainly because they are cheaper. I don't mind spending extra for quality when it comes to some things, like electronics for example, but spending extra for a HB doesn't increase the quality of the read. I don't think I could justify shelling out the extra cash for HBs unless I was absolutely loaded.

  14. #14
    Administrator Administrator Hobbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Hobbit Towers, England
    Posts
    11,363
    Blog Entries
    126
    The cost concept has been mentioned before; in my experience you can buy HB's as cheap as Trades or even MMP's if you time it right and shop around. And it does become much cheaper of course when they split the HB into two MMP's.

    The big advantage of this is that can be up to a year before the MMP appears. Depends how long you can wait.

    Hobbit
    Mark

  15. #15
    True, Hobbit, true, but then you have to balance the cost of that time spent shopping around for deals on the HBs against the benefits of the format; a very subjective thing. For me, it just isn't worth it. As I alluded to, I don't find that reading HBs impacts my enjoyment of a book and I'm not concerned with collecting, so...

    The wait for the MMP's has on occasion been as issue. If you promise not to tell anyone, I'll admit to having splurged on a HB a couple of times when I just couldn't wait.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •