February 20th, 2012, 03:41 PM
Question about McDevitt's Firebird
Since I see this is nominated for an award I am interested in reading it. I read only one other of his books in this series (Seeker I think) and was a little disappointed because it did not resolve main questions posed.
Question is this, is reading the other books in the series required in order to read this one? Does it answer some or all of the mysteries it invokes?
February 20th, 2012, 05:38 PM
All books in the Seeker series have the flaw of not resolving issues, and all have a fantastic premise ultimatly unexplored as the story is sidelined into a survival story.
I gave up on that series early on. Arguably the best is, IIRC, the first one, The Engines of God.
I do not know if the Alex Benedict series suffers from similar flaws. Anyone?
February 20th, 2012, 06:37 PM
Actually Seeker is part of the Alex Benedict series that started years ago with A Talent for War and of which Firebird is (hopefully and plausibly based on the ending) the last as these really passed their expiration date, while the ones you are talking above are the Academy ones which i actually really enjoyed.
Originally Posted by Pennarin
As per Firebird, it is independent of the rest as all are set as Holmes/Watson mysteries in a 10k future that looks like the 50's US with a few extra gadgets; if you can stomach the very dated and homogeneous future, the book is among the best of its series though none compare to A Talent for War
Anyway the Nebula is not called the Jack McDevitt appreciation prize for nothing so you can skip this one and read Engines of God or the original A talent for War which are excellent
February 20th, 2012, 09:16 PM
Thanks for the responses. It certainly seems like I would not end of satisfied with it. However, I do not understand the comment about the Nebula's being a Jack McDevitt appreciation award?
February 20th, 2012, 10:17 PM
That has been a running joke for a few good years now as the Nebula shortlist seemed to have a McDevitt novel pretty much every year with only few exceptions; this year back to form...
Originally Posted by Smitty
February 21st, 2012, 08:08 AM
Jack McDevitt's Alex benedict series includes the following:
A Talent for War
The Devil's Eye
I've read all except Firebird. All of them can read as a standalone. They seem to follow a canned plotline, which almost seem formulaic (if that's a word). However, that being said I've enjoyed every one. It's almost like a guilty pleasure for me between really great space operas (which are few and far between). A Talent for War and Seeker were the two best in my opinion.
February 21st, 2012, 09:13 AM
I really enjoyed Polaris and Seeker too in addition to A Talent for War which I read in the early 90's and made me a huge McDevitt fan (I read all his novels) and even Devil's Eye kept my interest, but with Echo the worldbuilding just came crashing down imho and while Firebird was better, I hope he will write something else - eg Time Travelers Never Die was light but funny and entertaining sf
Originally Posted by krisbslick
March 3rd, 2012, 07:11 AM
I write SF. SF is cool.
My own 2 cents: I have never been dissatisfied with a McDevitt novel; I consider them all to be excellent.
Thing is, McDevitt is simply not to everyone's taste. He doesn't write wildly dramatic or over-the-top sci fi, he doesn't populate his novels with exotic aliens all speaking English and fighting to rule the galaxy, and his characters don't have latent telepathic powers or cybernetic implants.
What he does write is very intelligent and well-constructed stories, set in a believable future. If that appeals to you, you should read all of his work. Obviously, others agree, which is why he's been on the Nebula short list for so long.