Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 36
  1. #1
    Registered User MoonDoggie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Miskatonic University
    Posts
    27

    Better than the book?

    Like most avid readers I usually say, "The book is so much better than the movie." However, there have been times when I actually liked the movie better than the book. The Postman is one of them and Practical Magic is another. In both cases I saw the movie first and decided to read the book afterwards.

    How about the rest of you? Do you think it matters which you're exposed to first?

  2. #2
    Quitters Inc. is a Stephen King story from the movie Cats Eye that I thought was compelling and had a shocking twist at the end in the movie, but was just "meh" when I read it.

    I'll go so far to say that Starship Troopers was a great summer action flick, better than the book for excitement and action. I'm not saying this movie was better than the book in general, but they made the movie that a lot of people wanted and did a good job.

  3. #3
    Registered User Loerwyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    England
    Posts
    6,233
    I'm not really of the idea that adaptations are necessarily worse than the text they're from. See, what happens is people have their own ideas, visions and so forth and in a bizarre way it colours what they see because it's not their interpretation.

    I enjoyed the three Narnia films, Coraline, The Black Cauldron, No Country For Old Men, True Grit (the recent one) and other interpretations though I wouldn't say they were better than the book (if I'd read it).

    One of the few that was at least on the same level as the book that I know of is Persepolis, and it has to be watched in French.

  4. #4
    Registered User SilentDan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    A house on a hill somewhere in Australia.
    Posts
    189
    Blog Entries
    4
    Lord of the Rings.

    What?

  5. #5
    Registered User JimF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    619
    I thought the Watchman movie was better than the graphic novel, but only by a little. I never really liked the squid.

  6. #6
    Registered User Aktunka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    135
    I felt that both the movie and book versions of Watchmen had strengths and weaknesses, but the endings, I felt that the movie version was far better than the alien squid thing in the book.

    If you want a great example of a show that actually surpasses the written material, look no further than True Blood. Don't get me wrong, I also own the books and enjoy them, but the show brings so many of the characters to life in a way that you don't get in the books. Also, the show has trimmed out a lot of the unneeded stuff from the books.

  7. #7
    Registered User JunkMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Slap Bang in the Middle of Infinity
    Posts
    1,637
    Any adaptation of anything by Edgar Rice Burroughs is better than the book - even if it does have Doug McClure in it.*

    Tarkovsky's 1972 Solaris is a vast improvement on the novel.







    *The exact opposite applies to any adaptation of A Philip K Dick story.

  8. #8
    Registered User Loerwyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    England
    Posts
    6,233
    I'd say the adaptation of Marjane Satrapi's Persepolis is, if not better, then at least is as good as the book. Loses some of its power and message as it's reduced for a film (300+ page combined graphic novel into a single film), but still pretty darned good.

  9. #9
    The Good Solaar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Isle of Wight, England
    Posts
    1,425
    Quote Originally Posted by JunkMonkey View Post
    Tarkovsky's 1972 Solaris is a vast improvement on the novel.

    *The exact opposite applies to any adaptation of A Philip K Dick story.
    Agreed on Solaris. The book was good, but the film was better.

    HOWEVER, Junk, in my opinion Bladerunner beats 'Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep' hands down.

    A masterpiece of a film.

    Solaar
    shining eyes

  10. #10
    Registered User JunkMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Slap Bang in the Middle of Infinity
    Posts
    1,637
    But they lost all the humour! Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep is such a funny book. You'd never guess from the film.


    But otherwise, yes, I'd forgotten about that one.

  11. #11
    Registered User Loerwyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    England
    Posts
    6,233
    In non-genre films, how about True Grit? I'm reading the book, but I think the film (latest w/ Bridges, Brolin, etc) is that little bit better.

  12. #12
    Artist, Cartoonist & Dude Action Avenue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Iowa, USA
    Posts
    47
    I think the movie Jaws is much better than the book. The Running Man movie adaptation is supremely superior to the book. It's one of the few instances in which I would say Stephen King (aka Richard Bachman) missed the mark.

  13. #13
    The Good Solaar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Isle of Wight, England
    Posts
    1,425
    Quote Originally Posted by Action Avenue View Post
    I think the movie Jaws is much better than the book.
    BLASPHEMY! Ah, ok, the Jaws book was very, very good, but the film itself is in my top three of all time, so it edges it. But only just. The book itself had that great little side-story including 'the affair', and definitely had a lot more life and edge to it. But the film... the film... genius.

    Loerwyn - agreed. When I knew the True Grit film was being remade I downloaded the book to my phone... and wasn't overly impressed.

    Solaar
    and Bruce

  14. #14
    Registered User JunkMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Slap Bang in the Middle of Infinity
    Posts
    1,637
    Quote Originally Posted by Loerwyn View Post
    In non-genre films, how about True Grit? I'm reading the book, but I think the film (latest w/ Bridges, Brolin, etc) is that little bit better.
    ...erm... True Grit is a genre film. It's a Western.

    I would say any version of Dracula is better than the novel. In fact I suspect that any version of anything by Stoker has to be an improvement on his stodgy prose. I'm even prepared to extend this as far as Ken Russell's overblown bollocks of an adaptation of The Lair of the White Worm and I loath Ken Russell's films (though I do like Amanda Donahoe's norks which were the only reason to watch this and The Rainbow). I'm trying to read the book at the moment. It's awful.
    Last edited by JunkMonkey; October 2nd, 2012 at 07:42 AM.

  15. #15
    Registered User Loerwyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    England
    Posts
    6,233
    Quote Originally Posted by JunkMonkey View Post
    ...erm... True Grit is a genre film. It's a Western.
    I meant 'genre' as in SF/F/H

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •