Not really. First 5 deal with
Are you also a little confused by the decision to chop this series up into three separate chunks? It seems like a very odd choice, although I'm sure there must be a reason for it. A five week run hardly seems worth the time though!
, the second with the aftermath and
, the third block is the
run up to the 50th anniversary?
Sort've makes sense.. to me, if no one else!
For practical reasons it also means that you're not tying up the main actors for the year, so they can do other things, and so they don't leave to pursue other interests... with a couple of exceptions! Transmission wise it means you're not having to break up the run for Bank holidays, Easter, Christmas etc.
Last edited by Hobbit; September 15th, 2012 at 07:29 AM.