Results 31 to 45 of 110
-
August 24th, 2012, 01:57 PM #31
-
August 24th, 2012, 02:21 PM #32
-
August 24th, 2012, 03:25 PM #33
I think the idea that other races will want to leave their own planet, to explore, colonize or conquer, just because we do, is a huge assumption.
-
August 24th, 2012, 03:51 PM #34
Would such people not become scientific and technologically advanced and not be able to do it anyway? And then their is the peculiar thing with Chinese exploration. They sent a fleet to Africa. They could have colonized Australia before the British. But they broke up the fleet and discontinued exploration instead.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zheng_He
But for such an attitude to persist for thousands of years after a culture became technological would seem rather odd.
psik
-
August 24th, 2012, 04:05 PM #35
Regarding Ray Guns...
Does this count? Niven's Slaver Disintegrator?
http://www.technovelgy.com/ct/content.asp?Bnum=558
There was also Leslie Neilson's sidearm in Forbidden Planet. He used it to vaporize a tiger, but that was film.
-
August 24th, 2012, 05:13 PM #36
-
August 24th, 2012, 05:53 PM #37
-
August 24th, 2012, 07:37 PM #38
Spaceships Having wings-Really? there is no air in space to keep the craft afloat
-
August 24th, 2012, 07:57 PM #39
-
August 24th, 2012, 08:01 PM #40
This reminds me: One thing I dislike is when authors have a character point out that "even in the future" spaceships are ugly because they only need to be utilitarian. That after hundreds of years of science-fictional space travel a spaceship still looks like something designed by NASA, e.g. a giant skeleton frame with an engine at the end, spherical tanks at the front near the habitat. Bull. If the economy allows it, you can custom its appearance, or its very frame can be shaped in an esthetically-pleasing shape.
-
August 24th, 2012, 08:22 PM #41



All the Sci-Fi books I've read (Peter Hamilton;Orson Scott Card) had specific craft to go from planet to space and vice versa ... Think Of the Apollo 11 mission. Did the spacecraft actually land on the moon? No they had a lander Craft for that...
And the Space shuttle was just that,a shuttle, I'm talking about interplanitary Space craft here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Lunar_Module
-
August 24th, 2012, 08:42 PM #42
-
August 25th, 2012, 09:57 AM #43
-
August 25th, 2012, 01:30 PM #44
Spaceships aren't ships either, they're spacecraft. So they don't have deck swabbers and bottle washers and rear turret gunner's mates. They also don't have flight decks or bridges. In fact, they're not even pointy at the front. And they're flown chiefly by computer - in fact some, like the Soyuz or Skylon, are flown entirely by computer - which means they don't really require pilots.
-
August 25th, 2012, 04:18 PM #45




Reply With Quote
Bookmarks