Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    @PeteMC666 PeteMC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,735

    Incendiary cannon arrows

    Mike Loades, author of the excellent Swords and Swordsmen and all round historical Good Chap (tm), shared this awesome picture on Facebook today.

    http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fb...3286970&type=1

    If you don't do FB, the thing looks to be about four feet long and the commentary reads:

    "Mary Rose Museum

    Alex Hildred, Curator of Ordnance at the Mary Rose, examines an incendiary arrow, one of the more unusual weapons found on the Mary Rose.

    Made of silver fir with an oak flight, this object was found at the stern of the Mary Rose, alongside a bronze demiculverin (a type of cannon) which appears to have been the primary method of deployment. The head would have consisted of a pitch-coated cloth bag, containing Incendiary Mixture (gunpowder and sulphur) and a large iron spike, which would have embedded in the side of a ship, allowing the incendiary mix to blow a hole in the side."


    Giant arrows. Fired out of cannon. On fire. Oh, the possibilities...

  2. #2
    Registered User JimF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    603
    All my old D&D characters are jealous.

  3. #3
    @PeteMC666 PeteMC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,735
    I know what you mean, and this stuff is so much cooler when you know it was actually real!

  4. #4
    Doomfarer
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Cair Paravel by the Shining Sea
    Posts
    424
    The big question of course is did it work? I can see a number of problems with it ranging from not always sticking in the target vessel and the charge exploding early. In fact, it looks like the sort of weapon that the inventor should have been made to sit on it metaphorically speaking until the idea went away.

  5. #5
    It could be worse. ~tmso Moderator N. E. White's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    5,511
    Blog Entries
    18
    Looks like something for Mythbusters (the T.V. show) to tackle.

  6. #6
    @PeteMC666 PeteMC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,735
    Obviously there's no saying it actually worked!

    It could be every bit as much fun in a story to watch it not work, of course...

  7. #7
    It could be worse. ~tmso Moderator N. E. White's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    5,511
    Blog Entries
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by PeteMC View Post
    Obviously there's no saying it actually worked!

    It could be every bit as much fun in a story to watch it not work, of course...
    Right, in a story setting, absolutely fun. But I do want to see if it would work. It probably did enough to warrant putting it on that ship!

  8. #8
    @PeteMC666 PeteMC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,735
    I would have thought so, given this sort of thing wouldn't have been cheap I assume some sort of testing would have been done.

    I don't know how well Mike Loades is known in the States but over here he has an occasional TV show on the history channel where he recreates ancient weapons and tests them (he did chariot archery a while ago, which was amazing!) so with a bit of luck he'll get his production company interested enough to let him have a go at this at some point.

  9. #9
    We Read for Light Window Bar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Southern Oregon, USA
    Posts
    884
    What's the time period for this weapon? 17th Century? 18th? 19th?

    --Wb

  10. #10
    @PeteMC666 PeteMC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,735
    Tudor - the Mary Rose sank in 1545 so sometime before then.

    http://www.maryrose.org/ if you're interested.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •