Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22
  1. #1

    What's so good about Casino Royale?

    Honestly, what do you people see in Casino Royale? I'm not trying to start contreversy I just really want to know. Half the movie is them playing poker. Another half is a stupid forced relationship between him and two different girls with no qualities that would make them any different from your steriotypical model type. And what is this?? He nearly dies from drink poisoning? What Bond dies from drinking a martini??? That just shows how weak this movie is, there's only one awsome gun scene and that's the very first part of the movie. The only parts of this movie I enjoyed were the opening credits (that song is amazing) and the scene where Bond is being tortured which was absolutely hillarious. But really, enlighten me. What was so good about that movie?

  2. #2
    The makers of the movie wanted to change Bond from being all about gadgets to having a plot. This is due to the fact that the two previous books went to far, and had gadgets involving invisible cars, and space ships. Because of that, the makers now decided to remove the gadgets.

    Personally I found it interesting. It wasn't what I would call a "Bond" movie, but it was a decent film. That being said, it's all a matter of preference. Do you prefer gadgets and the old-school bond, or do you want a plot, and something actually possible.

  3. #3
    Well see that's the point. I do want plot but this movie doesn't exactly do it very well. I mean, a casino tournament where you have to bet in a million dollars? Plus what's with the girls? You want us to feel bad about them dying but one of them was cheating on her husban and the other was going against bond and taking his money. I want plot, but if you're not going to put effort into it, just keep with the shooting.

  4. #4
    Member of Team Kronos Konrad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    295
    I thought that it didn't have the things that make a Bond-movie. No gadgets and no superbadguy.
    I was disappointed...

  5. #5
    Loveable Rogue Moderator juzzza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    In the shadows
    Posts
    3,890
    I think that was the studio's intention... I.E. move the franchise away from 80's cheese, gadgets and a very un-PC perspective on women.

    The weaknesses discussed in this thread, for me at least, are the movie's strengths.

    They wanted to inject some gritty dialogue and focus much more on what influenced Bond's characterization. He is a killer. He is emotionally unavailable.

    Sure, they had to throw in some explosions, some one-liners and there had to be gadgets... but they did all this through a '2006 filter'. The audience for Bond has evolved and they have evolved the franchise with it. They picked an un-conventional actor to play Bond, they picked an alternative rocker to sing the theme tune (Chris Cornell) and they paid attention to the script and made sure the violence was realistic and gritty.

    Perhaps the audience looking for 'awesome gun scenes' and torture are looking in the wrong place. Check out the slew of Japanese gangster movies on the market.

    I haven't bothered to watch a Bond movie at the cinema for almost a decade... the last one I attempted to watch on DVD, I turned off half-way through and sold at a car boot sale soon after.

    I loved Casino Royale, but then I just really enjoyed Rocky Balboa!

  6. #6
    In transit Muess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    266
    Quote Originally Posted by juzzza View Post
    Perhaps the audience looking for 'awesome gun scenes' and torture are looking in the wrong place. Check out the slew of Japanese gangster movies on the market.
    Or perhaps the movie studios wanting to make movies with meaningful plots are looking in the wrong place and should of come up with (shock, horror) a new franchise idea for this instead of messing with the established Bond formula. That's my take on it anyway. I enjoyed the film but there was no need for it to be a Bond film

  7. #7
    Loveable Rogue Moderator juzzza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    In the shadows
    Posts
    3,890
    They'd probably argue that they are doing that (creating new franchises)... but they are also a business and so why would they not want to milk a cashcow like an established franchise?

    Like any product, the best way to ensure longevity is to re-invent it and adapt to the changing market.

  8. #8
    In transit Muess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    266
    You are undoubtedly right. Unfortunately, that's small consolation for long time fans.

  9. #9
    Loveable Rogue Moderator juzzza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    In the shadows
    Posts
    3,890
    Sure... but please spare a thought for the Highlander fans... now there is a tragic story... and franchise.
    Last edited by juzzza; January 30th, 2007 at 10:45 AM.

  10. #10
    In transit Muess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    266
    Unfortunately for me I'm also a Highlander fan!

  11. #11
    Loveable Rogue Moderator juzzza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    In the shadows
    Posts
    3,890
    Oh dear... in that case, feel free to moan about Bond, lol!

  12. #12
    BLOOD FREASH TASTY BLOOD gollumbells's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    The sea, looking for food constantly.
    Posts
    346
    Would it really fit in if Bond had all the latest gadgets just after he has been promoted? Im sure the gadgets will return, but they shouldnt go too far with them like the invisible car.

  13. #13
    In transit Muess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    266
    I agree Die Another Day was over the top even for a Bond film. I loved Tomorrow Never Dies though.

  14. #14
    In need of a night light The Dark Truth's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Not in Kansas anymore
    Posts
    67
    juzzza nailed my feeling on why I liked it.

  15. #15
    Where's Tonto zorobnice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Cape Town, South Africa
    Posts
    560
    I thought CR was the best of the Bond's so far. He was more real. The fact that this was one of the early Flemming books, explains to the viewer why he bacame what he was in the later movies, thus showing his motivation. Remember in the beginning the one agent discloses that Bond had just received his double O status. All in all I enjoyed it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •