Home Literature Stories Movies Games Comics Blogs News Discussion Forum Art Gallery
  Science Fiction and Fantasy News
SFFWorld News – 10/31/09 (10-31)
MERLIN Book Signing at Forbidden Planet UK (10-22)
Coming Soon TEMPEST RISING (10-09)
How Victorious is the Victorious Parasol? (10-07)

Official sffworld Reviews
Wolfbreed by S. Andrew Swann (11-02 - Book)
Diving into the Wreck by Kristine Kathryn Rusch (11-02 - Book)
Isis by Douglas Clegg (10-26 - Book)
Salamander by Nick Kyme (10-19 - Book)

Site Index

Movie Info    Bookmark and Share

Mission to Mars  (9 ratings)

A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - J - K - L - M - N - O - P - Q - R - S - T - U - V - W - X - Y - Z

Rating  (9 ratings)
Rate this movie
(5 best - 1 worst)
 
Movie Information
TitleMission to Mars
Director
YearUnknown
Production Company
GenreScience Fiction
 
Movie Reviews
 
Submitted by Raven@n2jazz.com 
(Dec 12, 2000)

I heard that this movie wasn't so great, but then I watched it. This movie was so unlike any other Alien movie I had ever seen. In most alien movies, e.t.'s are considered as these evil creatures trying to take over the world and destroy us all. BORING. That's what I like so much about this movie. It gives a totally different view of aliens, humane. When I first started watching it, I was expecting just another Independence Day/Men In Black/Mars Attacks type plot, who wasn't. But, as I continued watching it, I realized just how different this movie was. All in all, I'd say that this was a great movie.


Submitted by Margaret Kosakiewicz 
(Mar 15, 2000)

"Mission to Mars" is an unsuccessful marriage of psychological drama and science fiction. When one goes to see a "SF" one expects action, excitement and a touch of something new and unexpected. What one gets is long, long scenes of characters looking at each other meaningfully, long, long scenes of useless dialogue, and a climax that, although interesting, not very original.

The beginning promises the viewer excitement. A strange artifact discovered on Mars causes the death of 3 of the 4 astronauts. Yet, it almost doesn't deliver. As I was watching, between yawns and sighs of boredom, I became sure that if the movie were 10 min shorter, the rescue mission would never get to Mars.

They eventually did but, wait, even though they haven't had any communication with one surviving member of the original expedition in over six months, instead of running to check if the guy is still alive, all 3 of the rescuers must first take time to dig up, clean up and replace the American flag in its rightful place.

Here is another example: The ship the rescuers are traveling in has been hit by a micro meteor, which caused a hull breech. The atmosphere is leaking at about 0.5% per second but the guy that has to go outside to fix the hole takes two minutes (that's 120 seconds and 60% of atmosphere) to smooch and whisper tender good byes with his wife while another "astronaut" refuses to put his helmet on and almost suffocates because "it takes too much time". Give me a break. If this is the sort of astronauts NASA will be sending out into space in the future, God help us all.

I think the most irritating thing in SF movies are writers who take "creative license" with the laws of physics. In the process of initiating the descent protocol the ship blows up. The astronauts must abandon ship and go on a space walk to catch a ride on an escape pod orbiting the planet. The above mentioned affectionate husband launches himself to attach a tether to the pod but, even though he accomplishes his mission, ends up catapulted into space with no fuel left in his personal jet outfit. His wife, battling many different emotions and wasting valuable time as her husband is speeding toward the planet, finally decides to risk her life and rescue him. She fuels up and gets the jets going, but as she burns half of the fuel and reaches the "point of no return", she turns off the jets and stops dead. Whatever happened to "body in motion will remain in motion until acted by another force"?

Oh well, overall it was a disappointing and boring movie. I recommend waiting for a VHS version.


 

Latest

Wolfbreed by S. Andrew Swann
11-02 - Book Review
Diving into the Wreck by Kristine Kathryn Rusch
11-02 - Book Review
SFFWorld News – 10/31/09
10-31 - News
Isis by Douglas Clegg
10-26 - Book Review
Isis by Douglas Clegg
10-26 - Book Review
Isis by Douglas Clegg
10-26 - Book Review
Isis by Douglas Clegg
10-26 - Book Review
MERLIN Book Signing at Forbidden Planet UK
10-22 - News
Salamander by Nick Kyme
10-19 - Book Review
The Windup Girl by Paolo Bacigalupi
10-12 - Book Review
Triumff: Her Majesty's Hero by Dan Abnett
10-11 - Book Review
Coming Soon – TEMPEST RISING
10-09 - News
Something that is not a packaging device.
10-09 - News
How Victorious is the Victorious Parasol?
10-07 - News
The odd neighbors of a first-time homeowner
10-07 - News
Silly Fantasies
10-06 - News
Leviathan by Scott Westerfeld
10-05 - Book Review
X-Isle by Steve Augarde
10-04 - Book Review
In Their Own Words: K.J. Parker on The Company
10-02 - News
“It Somehow Always Involved an Assassin with Extraordinary Powers And A Love of Espressos”
10-02 - News
The Drowning City by Amanda Downum
10-01 - Book Review
Antarctica by Kim Stanley Robinson
09-28 - News
Beauty by Sheri S. Tepper
09-28 - News
Bellwether by Connie Willis
09-28 - News
The Bone Doll's Twin by Lynn Flewelling
09-28 - News
Brightness Reef by David Brin
09-28 - News
Chaos and Order by Stephen R. Donaldson
09-28 - News
Collected Stories of Robert Silverberg by Robert Silverberg
09-28 - News
A Dark and Hungry God Arises by Stephen R. Donaldson
09-28 - News
The Black Raven by Katharine Kerr
09-28 - News

New Forum Posts




About - Advertising - Contact us - RSS - For Authors & Publishers - Contribute / Submit - Privacy Policy - Community Login
Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use. The contents of this webpage are copyright © 1997-2009 sffworld.com. All Rights Reserved.