Home Literature Stories Movies Games Comics Blogs News Discussion Forum Art Gallery
  Science Fiction and Fantasy News
MORE AUTHORS CONFIRMED FOR DISCOVER FESTIVAL (01-27)
Angry Robot's Open Door Month returns (01-25)
New Event, Leicestershire, England (01-08)
Dark Hall Press - new Horror Fiction imprint, (11-03)

Official sffworld Reviews
Necropath by Eric Brown (02-06 - Book)
Blue Remembered Earth by Alastair Reynolds (02-06 - Book)
WOOL by Hugh Howey (02-02 - Book)
Molly Fyde and the Parsona Rescue by Hugh Howey (02-02 - Book)


Site Index

Movie Info    Bookmark and Share

Mission to Mars  (9 ratings)

A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - J - K - L - M - N - O - P - Q - R - S - T - U - V - W - X - Y - Z

Rating  (9 ratings)
Rate this movie
(5 best - 1 worst)
 
Movie Information
TitleMission to Mars
Director
YearUnknown
Production Company
GenreScience Fiction
 
Movie Reviews
 
Submitted by Raven@n2jazz.com 
(Dec 12, 2000)

I heard that this movie wasn't so great, but then I watched it. This movie was so unlike any other Alien movie I had ever seen. In most alien movies, e.t.'s are considered as these evil creatures trying to take over the world and destroy us all. BORING. That's what I like so much about this movie. It gives a totally different view of aliens, humane. When I first started watching it, I was expecting just another Independence Day/Men In Black/Mars Attacks type plot, who wasn't. But, as I continued watching it, I realized just how different this movie was. All in all, I'd say that this was a great movie.


Submitted by Margaret Kosakiewicz 
(Mar 15, 2000)

"Mission to Mars" is an unsuccessful marriage of psychological drama and science fiction. When one goes to see a "SF" one expects action, excitement and a touch of something new and unexpected. What one gets is long, long scenes of characters looking at each other meaningfully, long, long scenes of useless dialogue, and a climax that, although interesting, not very original.

The beginning promises the viewer excitement. A strange artifact discovered on Mars causes the death of 3 of the 4 astronauts. Yet, it almost doesn't deliver. As I was watching, between yawns and sighs of boredom, I became sure that if the movie were 10 min shorter, the rescue mission would never get to Mars.

They eventually did but, wait, even though they haven't had any communication with one surviving member of the original expedition in over six months, instead of running to check if the guy is still alive, all 3 of the rescuers must first take time to dig up, clean up and replace the American flag in its rightful place.

Here is another example: The ship the rescuers are traveling in has been hit by a micro meteor, which caused a hull breech. The atmosphere is leaking at about 0.5% per second but the guy that has to go outside to fix the hole takes two minutes (that's 120 seconds and 60% of atmosphere) to smooch and whisper tender good byes with his wife while another "astronaut" refuses to put his helmet on and almost suffocates because "it takes too much time". Give me a break. If this is the sort of astronauts NASA will be sending out into space in the future, God help us all.

I think the most irritating thing in SF movies are writers who take "creative license" with the laws of physics. In the process of initiating the descent protocol the ship blows up. The astronauts must abandon ship and go on a space walk to catch a ride on an escape pod orbiting the planet. The above mentioned affectionate husband launches himself to attach a tether to the pod but, even though he accomplishes his mission, ends up catapulted into space with no fuel left in his personal jet outfit. His wife, battling many different emotions and wasting valuable time as her husband is speeding toward the planet, finally decides to risk her life and rescue him. She fuels up and gets the jets going, but as she burns half of the fuel and reaches the "point of no return", she turns off the jets and stops dead. Whatever happened to "body in motion will remain in motion until acted by another force"?

Oh well, overall it was a disappointing and boring movie. I recommend waiting for a VHS version.


 

Latest

Necropath by Eric Brown
02-06 - Book Review
Blue Remembered Earth by Alastair Reynolds
02-06 - Book Review
WOOL by Hugh Howey
02-02 - Book Review
Molly Fyde and the Parsona Rescue by Hugh Howey
02-02 - Book Review
Rogue Moon by Algis Budrys
02-01 - Book Review
Interview with Hugh Howey
02-01 - Interview
Tau Ceti by Kevin Anderson
01-31 - Book Review
Well of Sorrows by Benjamin Tate
01-31 - Book Review
Dead in the Water by Sandy Mitchell
01-31 - Book Review
Interview with Myke Cole Part 2
01-29 - Interview
MORE LEADING AUTHORS CONFIRMED FOR DISCOVER FESTIVAL
01-27 - News
Interview with Myke Cole
01-25 - Interview
Angry Robot's Open Door Month returns
01-25 - News
Rise of Empire by Michael J. Sullivan
01-24 - Book Review
Empire State by Adam Christopher
01-21 - Book Review
Control Point by Myke Cole
01-17 - Book Review
Seven Princes by John R. Fultz
01-11 - Book Review
The Emperor's Knife by Mazarkis Williams
01-10 - Book Review
New Event, Leicestershire, England
01-08 - News
SFFWorld Review of the Year 2011: Part 3
01-06 - Article
The Recollection by Gareth L. Powell
01-03 - Book Review
Zombies: A Compendium of the Living Dead by Otto Penzler
01-02 - Book Review
SFFWorld Review of the Year, 2011: Part 2
01-02 - Article
SFFWorld Review of the Year 2011: Part 1
12-30 - Article
SFFWorld Review of the Year 2011: Part 1
12-30 - Article
Seed by Rob Ziegler
12-28 - Book Review
Who Goes There? by John W. Campbell
12-27 - Book Review
Conan the Indomitable by Robert E. Howard
12-24 - Book Review
The Astounding, the Amazing and the Unknown by Paul Malmont
12-24 - Book Review
War With the Newts by Karel Capek
12-24 - Book Review

New Forum Posts




About - Advertising - Contact us - RSS - For Authors & Publishers - Contribute / Submit - Privacy Policy - Community Login
Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use. The contents of this webpage are copyright © 1997-2011 sffworld.com. All Rights Reserved.