Things I Have Noticed

I've heard that Mel Brooks is staging a musical version of "Young Frankenstein" here in the Seattle area...

I think it's the same thing that promotes a new Mustang that looks like the old Mustang. Innovation that works is harder than copying old stuff that did work. But that's not a new conclusion by any means. And we see it in our own book field all the time.

I think the lesson to be learned (at least from the media side) is to finagle contracts that let you be a participant (actor, director, lighting guy, special effects, whatever) in all the planned sequels, but in which you have an escape clause to let you out if the first one tanks.
 
Speaking of the precipitous Death of Movies, I've been amused at the cyclical Death of the Book outbreak we've had lately. Seems the Atlanta, Georgia newspaper in the States, realizing that book publishers and booksellers were never going to spend much in print advertising -- certainly nothing like the millions spent by the movie people -- decided to toss their book review and lay off their book editor. The southern regional author and publisher community -- the most successful of regional communities -- had a Read-In protest over this, which got the media's attention and led to the Is the Book Dying articles that have periodically appeared all throughout my life. And now, on the Web!

I don't mind the Death of the Book stuff, because it gets authors on t.v. Salmon Rushdie was just on the Colbert Report talking about it. I would like to see more media attention paid to more alarming news, such as Borders shutting down many of its superstores, but we take what we can get.
 
Speaking of the precipitous Death of Movies, I've been amused at the cyclical Death of the Book outbreak we've had lately. Seems the Atlanta, Georgia newspaper in the States, realizing that book publishers and booksellers were never going to spend much in print advertising -- certainly nothing like the millions spent by the movie people -- decided to toss their book review and lay off their book editor. The southern regional author and publisher community -- the most successful of regional communities -- had a Read-In protest over this, which got the media's attention and led to the Is the Book Dying articles that have periodically appeared all throughout my life. And now, on the Web!

I don't mind the Death of the Book stuff, because it gets authors on t.v. Salmon Rushdie was just on the Colbert Report talking about it. I would like to see more media attention paid to more alarming news, such as Borders shutting down many of its superstores, but we take what we can get.

Another symptom of the times: publishing as reality show. As in, in order to get published you have to avoid getting voted off the island. Bookseller Chick had in her blog a few days ago a column headed, "Gathering Information on Gather.com" that outlines how Simon and Schuster have this lovely idea for everybody submitting their stories on line and everybody voting on who stays and who goes. I see this as an evil plot whereby the publishers try to prove that they really don't need to be paying for all those editors anyway, they can just move the whole function to the web and get it done for free...

Oh, and speaking of web weirdness, if you really want your blood to curdle, check this out: a local news website in L.A. is outsourcing the local news of their community to reporters in India, all strictly to cuts costs. I'm sure the folks in Bangalore will really be able to relate to the local happenings in Pasadena... :rolleyes:
 
blog a few days ago a column headed, "Gathering Information on Gather.com" that outlines how Simon and Schuster have this lovely idea for everybody submitting their stories on line and everybody voting on who stays and who goes. I see this as an evil plot whereby the publishers try to prove that they really don't need to be paying for all those editors anyway, they can just move the whole function to the web and get it done for free...

Has public voting ever been a reliable indicator of sales? (With all those casting shows it's the show that makes money, not the resultant "star". Of the Austrian and German variety, few of the participants had staying power, and those that did were invariably runners-up.) Voting with a click is not the same as voting with a wallet. Let them try that. I doubt it will work out, commercially. A combination of "Baen free library" + POD might work better.

Of course, I have no experience whatsoever marketing books. :p
 
This could be a lemons and lemonade situation. Her Greatness *, Dawnstorm, and you, Mr. Radical Thorn, all have day jobs that greatly reduce the time available for writing. If you each employ this technique, you'll have lots more time for other things such as entertaining significant others, painting, attending concerts, doing CGI, et al. Simply outsource a chapter here and there and be amazed at how quickly that 200K-word novel comes together.

* After TLWSHLWM and I watched her Mother's Day present yesterday afternoon, a copy of The Queen with Helen Mirren, I am now supplied with a new mental image of Her Greatness. The final sitting room scene between the Queen and Tony Blair seems to me the perfect capsule of Her Greatness and the rest of us.:D
 
LOL, Simon & Schuster might want to work on fixing their utterly horrible website first before launching a web contest. It's a similar idea to stuff that's been done before with contests, though. It lets them have a slush pile without having to devote staff to it. Then they can publish the "winner" in a special series. It could be a launching pad for some authors. And at least they are attempting to use the Web.

What I would really like to see, though, is for them to stop concentrating on debuts and new ms. and try to really make use of the Web for the books on their list. But you get the feeling more and more that they just don't have a clue how to do that.

* After TLWSHLWM and I watched her Mother's Day present yesterday afternoon, a copy of The Queen with Helen Mirren, I am now supplied with a new mental image of Her Greatness. The final sitting room scene between the Queen and Tony Blair seems to me the perfect capsule of Her Greatness and the rest of us.

Is this me or Sheepie? I wouldn't mind out-sourcing actually. Can you start on Chapter 1 for me, HE? (Oh, and anybody want a cat? Get off the damn desk, Bob! No, not on the printer!)
 
Can you start on Chapter 1 for me, HE? (Oh, and anybody want a cat? Get off the damn desk, Bob! No, not on the printer!)

Oh, goodie! I would love to see HE work in KatG's prose universe. The results would be... so very different... :D
 
The only issues that I can see is that Her Greatness would have to send me the outline for Chapter 1 and then we'd need to negotiate the number of martinis appropriate to the effort. If it's a three martini effort then I cannot commit to any deadlines.
 
Outline? Outline? I have no time for these things you call outlines. Make something up. Then I'll pass it on to the next contractor. :)

Of course, that probably is a three martini effort. You know, this outsourcing thing is complicated.
 
Outline for Chapter 1:

Opening scene involves Hero contemplating the universe's navel eventually concluding that its very existence implies alternate universes, some of which may not rely on the magic of pregnancy even though the one he occupies and at least one other obviously do.
Reverie interrupted by villain's telepathic notice that the Hero has t-mail, the obligatory Statement of Evil Intent/Grandiose Scheme to Conquer Everything and Everyone with express purpose of humiliating each and all.*
Next scene introduces the heroine set - triplets of varying ages as they are affected by time stunting incurred through unsupervised sampling of their grandfather's pipe - attempting to agree on their abduction by said villain. Two are for it but the third has the keys to the chariot.
Final scene depicts the hero's anguish when he discovers his favorite heroine has been taken by the villain leaving behind the two with whom he cannot communicate on any basis <not yet clear whether it is the villain or the hero who cannot communicate with these two>. Yet, he must communicate if they are to save the third, not to mention the world.

Seems like a two martini effort to me.

*Villain remains anonymous through the first six books though the hero should know that anyone knowledgeable of his IP <intelligence portal> must be someone very close to him. In time, he suspects one of the two available triplets but, as with most heros, he is wrong. The real villain is his pet Black Labrador whose motivation involves deep water deprivation.
 
Oh please, please, please write this. I'll buy you vodka. It sounds marvelous! But the hero needs a sidekick.
 
oooooooooo wonder how this chapter will be after all the vodka is swilled? hehe
 
Vodka?!! You're thinking I should drink vodka martinis? Has the East Coast deteriorated thus far from a state of grace that when one mentions martinis they leap to the conclusion that we must be talking vodka martinis? I blame this on Applebee's and their infinite variety of fruity nonsense that they have the gall to name martinis.
Please refer to Mr. James Bond, the man who taught me the meaning of martini, any further such heretical inferences. He, at least, is licensed to kill.
 
Fine, I'll buy you gin. Where's my opening paragraph? :) (I haven't drunken any alcohol since 1999, thanks to medication I'm on that does not allow it, so my main reference is Sex and the City reruns.)

I was going to protest being compared to Queen Elizabeth, but after snorting and ranting in the Writing Forum today, I have noticed :) that I have indeed turned into Queen Elizabeth. Is there a twelve-step program for that?
 
I was going to protest being compared to Queen Elizabeth, but after snorting and ranting in the Writing Forum today, I have noticed :) that I have indeed turned into Queen Elizabeth. Is there a twelve-step program for that?

"Our name is Katherine, and we've been regal now for some years. Our humble subjects have been most accomodating and understanding, restraining their reverence and only doffing their hats instead of prostrating themselves at our feet. This has helped us immeasurably in attaining a more balanced perspective on the plight of those living beyond the palace."

;)
 
Is there a twelve-step program for that?
Attempting a formal bow and succeeding no better than Cherie Blair, I offer Her Greatness my own favorite 12-step program:
1. Say into the mirror: people have the goddess-given right to make damned fools of themselves.
2. Say into the mirror: I cannot save the literary world single-handedly.
3. Say into the mirror: Even if I could save the literary world single-handedly, if the goddess wanted me to do that she’d have included it in my job description.
4. Say into the mirror: I am not the last rational person on this planet; it only seems that way.
5. Say into the mirror: I have my own child to worry about: I do not need to worry about the children on the sffworld forums as well.
6. Say into the mirror: It’s not as if I honestly believe I know all the correct answers. <Say this whether you believe it or not. If you don’t believe it, then say it three times while turning around with your index finger resting on the tip of your nose and one foot off the ground.>
7. Say into the mirror: They don’t pay me any attention anyway.
8. Say into the mirror: It’s not as if I don’t have better things to do. <This step is always included even when the person doesn’t have anything better to do than to seduce a spouse, guide a teenager, or spit out the next great fantasy novel.>
9. Say into the mirror: There-are-no-laws-in-writing is not a law, that if I don’t promulgate.it, will vanish from the composition books. <The Kurt Vonneguts will always appear when they’re needed.>
10. Say into the mirror: Why do I care whether the publishers are considered the worst evil to have hit the world since the printing press?
11. Say into the mirror: The internet makes everything I’ve ever claimed obsolete, anyway.
12. Say into the mirror: “F*** it!” and then go do what you damned well want to do.

Then, as commanded, I offer the first paragraph(s):
When the mood swept him, as it had this evening, to ponder the universe’s navel, Malcolm always opted for the pea. Certainly astronomical imagery abounded. The Horse Head Nebula, the Veil Nebula. The Rosette Nebula all made fine focal points. For that matter, the Milky Way could be appropriate inspiration if you wanted to consider vastness. But, vast navels seemed to Malcolm oxymoronic. So, the universe as a pea had the distinct advantage of utility. It worked for him.
Gazing at the pea, at its navel, Malcolm’s first path of inquiry took him to the Big Bang. Any universe navel must track to that event, he thought, and then he thought that The Big Bang would probably not fare well as slang for live birth. Men could handle it but he strongly doubted that women would see the humor. Anyway, if the Big Bang left remnants of an umbilical, then most of the mythos surrounding the event were probably wrong. An umbilical categorically eliminated a singularity.
His next line of thought took him to Asimov’s Foundation universe. What was the central mystery again? The Second Foundation lay at the other end of the galaxy. That was the mystery. the First was established at the rim and the Second Foundation at the galaxy’s other end. Extrapolating to the universe, all the galaxies are expanding away from one another, correct? But, doesn’t the Big Bang constitute an origination point, a common center from which the galaxies must running? Then, measure the direction of expansion for each galaxy and work backwards to the origin place. Any feasible navel must lie somewhere about such a place.
Why would a universe have a navel? Why did the pea in his hand have a navel? An artifact, a by product of its gestation. Want to know where you came from? Consider your navel. The pea carried the remnants of its pod, the universe must carry the remnants of its gestation: placenta, pod, call it what you will. The universe had a navel.
That meant there was a progenitor universe. At least one other universe did or had existed. That could mean that more than one other universe existed. After all, it takes two to tango and how can you have an umbilical without a tango?

Time froze.

T-mail happens so fast that it seems as if there is no time expenditure at all in the receiving and ‘reading’ the message. T-mails are neuronic episodes. Neurons respond to electrical impulses. Electrical impulses involve electrons traveling close to the speed of light. Things approaching the speed of light increase in mass. Thus, the common saying: t-mail is a massive headache.
Certainly, Malcolm, like most folk, was aware that electrons are damned near mass-less and photons are even more so. Still, damned near is not all the way to no mass at all and even the tiniest bit of almost-no-mass must expand as it approaches the speed of light which is why electrons are impossible to detect. They’ve gone damned near round the bend in the speed of light to energy. So, there they are: damned near no mass and damned near exceeding the speed of light. Physicists name this state complementarity.
Humans enduring complementarity in the form of t-mail tend to experience time as frozen.

Malcolm’s t-mail read: Standard Form 666: Notification of Evil Intent. You are herewith notified of my intent to conquer the known universe and all its inhabitants, sentient or otherwise. As evidence of this intent, I intend to deduct one of the triplets – Miinie, Moe, or Claudine. There is nothing you can do about this but I am required to let you know anyway. Having satisfied all appropriate regulations, laws, and commonly accepted socialisms, I remain faithfully yours, The Sacred Cow.
P.S. I am well aware of the difference between abduct, deduct, and subduct. I’ve kept up to date with my geology studies. I’ve also been to a chiropractor.
P.P.S. Minnifred, Maureen, and Claudine are also aware of my intent.
P.P.P.S. Have a nice day.

Time melted.


Beefeaters, please!
 
Last edited:
T-mails are neuronic episodes. Neurons respond to electrical impulses. Electrical impulses involve electrons traveling close to the speed of light. Things approaching the speed of light increase in mass. Thus, the common saying: t-mail is a massive headache.

I love that bit! :) All in all, another nice episode of HE-ism. Thank you.

Back on the subject of HRH KatG, despite our teasing, I do want to make the point that I think it really is "very good thing" that she is preaching her message. There are plenty of people who are more than happy to expound on rules, but precious few willing to stand up and point out that they are, in fact, really techniques, as she notes. We've all seen so many posts from new writers worried to death about this nit or that, instead of focusing on finding their own true voice.

I'm reminded of an adage from the world of car racing: owners always say that is better to have a driver who goes too fast and have to slow them down, than to try and get a slow driver to go faster. I would rather have a writer with vision and a unique point of view, who might then need only polishing for commercial use, than to try and expect such vision to emerge from under a morass of pre-emptive rules that stifle creativity and focus attention on the wrong things. We're in the idea business, not the manuscript formatting business. The latter is a means toward the ends, as they say.

So more power to our resident Queen. On such subjects, I am happy to be one of her loyal subjects. ;)
 
I'll be right with you after I get off the floor from laughing. .....Okay, better now.

HE: Magnificent! How do you come up with these metaphors? Of course, we might have a slight hitch as most fantasy readers will have run away screaming by the time they get to: "An umbilical categorically eliminated a singularity" but if you could throw in a magic sword somewhere, I'm sure we can work around it. (Seriously, it's really good. I don't suppose we could work the geisha narrative in it somewhere -- not quite the right tone maybe.)

So, does anyone know a good website for shipping liquor?

We've all seen so many posts from new writers worried to death about this nit or that, instead of focusing on finding their own true voice.

Yes, but I scare them. It is not productive to unload a decade's worth of frustration on some poor soul who is wondering whether a prologue can only be set a long time in the past or not. It stops conversation, and it doesn't teach them the options of technique, which is a different thing from just saying these aren't rules.

The problem, I think, is that my filters are somewhat shredded now. Working in publishing, you could tease an author you've worked with for a bit about being an idiot, but you couldn't stand up at a writer's conference, say, and tell them they are talking like the Mad Hatter at the tea party.

It would not even be fair to do so. Many publishing folk and prominent authors believe really strange stuff to be true. And when I was younger, I was told and believed certain "rules." I believed you could not write a longer work in second person. That turned out not to be true. I believed you could not have a murder mystery in which the criminal is not brought to justice because mystery readers wouldn't like it. That turned out not to be true, even back in Arthur Conan Doyle's day.

As I've stopped professional work and taken to hanging on websites as a hopeful author, I don't have to worry so much about filtering what I say, and sometimes I think I go overboard. But I appreciate the cheering up. And that you all have no problem telling me when I'm being too, er, imperious.
 
Ah, but you all missed the glaring error in the hero's logic. Everything is moving away from the Big Bang so the place to look for the traces of the navel are somewhere out on the rim of existence. But, it makes a nifty thought problem to wonder what is happening right now back there at the origin point. Are things still coming into creation, new matter, new galaxies, new stuff?! Could it be a leak from the mind of the goddess?
 

Sponsors


We try to keep the forum as free of ads as possible, please consider supporting SFFWorld on Patreon


Your ad here.
Back
Top