Window Bar
We Read for Light
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2009
- Messages
- 1,720
As someone who is pretty new to this profession, I have a question for the Old Hands:
A friend called me to point out that on Amazon I had just received a mocking, vicious 1-star review from a "gentleman" of about 60 years age who happens to dislike any fantasy book that doesn't exactly conform to his fundamentalist beliefs. Out of curiosity, my friend did a bit of internet research, finding that when the man reviews those who write in conformity with his beliefs, he awards four or five stars consistently.
The sad part is, the reviewer is a writer, too; although his one book has sold virtually zero copies in the past year (ranked at almost 4,000,000 on Amazon), so there's a whiff of jealousy when he reviews a book that has sold about forty paid copies (in addition to giveaways) in the past week.
My inclination is to grin and bear it, to let it go... mostly because when one gets into a pi**ing contest with a donkey, the donkey wins. For example, if he were banned by Amazon, he could nevertheless enlist dozens of co-believers to continue to pillory-and-stone the book on line.
My reviews, of course, have run all over the charts, and I welcome them. Readers, after all, have different artistic tastes and standards; and are generally quite fair in what they say. But this is the first time that bigotry has been the motivation.
Anyway, part of me is grumpy, part is laughing, and part of me even welcomes the controversy. It's the old adage that if, by the end of the day, a writer hasn't offended somebody, he's not doing his job.
So... to the longtime professionals in this group: Would you respond? If so, how?
Thanks --WB
A friend called me to point out that on Amazon I had just received a mocking, vicious 1-star review from a "gentleman" of about 60 years age who happens to dislike any fantasy book that doesn't exactly conform to his fundamentalist beliefs. Out of curiosity, my friend did a bit of internet research, finding that when the man reviews those who write in conformity with his beliefs, he awards four or five stars consistently.
The sad part is, the reviewer is a writer, too; although his one book has sold virtually zero copies in the past year (ranked at almost 4,000,000 on Amazon), so there's a whiff of jealousy when he reviews a book that has sold about forty paid copies (in addition to giveaways) in the past week.
My inclination is to grin and bear it, to let it go... mostly because when one gets into a pi**ing contest with a donkey, the donkey wins. For example, if he were banned by Amazon, he could nevertheless enlist dozens of co-believers to continue to pillory-and-stone the book on line.
My reviews, of course, have run all over the charts, and I welcome them. Readers, after all, have different artistic tastes and standards; and are generally quite fair in what they say. But this is the first time that bigotry has been the motivation.
Anyway, part of me is grumpy, part is laughing, and part of me even welcomes the controversy. It's the old adage that if, by the end of the day, a writer hasn't offended somebody, he's not doing his job.
So... to the longtime professionals in this group: Would you respond? If so, how?
Thanks --WB
Last edited:

