Cranky Hamster Wrote:
Grugh. This fills me with foreboding and woe.
I've had The Way of Shadows sitting around on my TBR pile since forever ago (i.e., at the peak of its buzz when nobody was yet saying "wait a minute this
is really pretty mediocre, wtf"), and while I'd settled my expectations comfortably down to "turn off brain, expect cartoony good fun," now I'm wondering if I ought to go a notch below that.
Meh. I'll still read it -- eventually -- but I'll settle my expectations somewhere firmly south of Michael Bay first.
Personally, ... well, I hate to say it, but I think you might be right to make with that resettling of expectations. Even if not too far south of Michael Bay, -- and your mileage will vary on this point depending on what sorts of things annoy you and how much, -- then certainly in Michael Bay's general vicinity. I would say that the opening sample chapter to The Way of Shadows is fairly representative, though there is some slightly more down to earth stuff early on in the first book whilst our young hero is still a boy living on the streets, and before he meets all the uberfolks and becomes one himself.
Just a couple of the things that get to me:
You know that thing that Hollywood blockbusters do sometimes where they put in a joke that violates the tone and has no purpose and is stupid just because there hasn't been a joke in a while? [New Startrek had a couple.] Weeks does this. It totally flips the story off its groove, and the jokes often sound very modern. And, I mean, the series isn't going for arcane in particular, but still, the modern colloquial expressions stick out. The bad jokes about sex and/or secondary sexual characteristics are the worst but not the only offenders.
When Weeks puts in evil people, they must be the eeeeeevilest evil people, and when there is gore it must be the grimiest grime that ever was grimey. The principle villain in Shadow's Edge kills little girls for fun. He's so evil I bet he even kicks puppies, and we all know that not even Sauron kicked puppies. It's not the violence or the dark material that I object to, -- this is gritty epic and if it's relevant to the story it should be there, -- so much as it is the sense that it is there just to prove how badass the books and the people in them are. Weeks does not do subtle. This no subtlety approach extends to character development as well, which leads to some howlers of moral speeches about finding friendship and love and the true meaning of Christmas.
They're cartoony good fun, and I feel guilty heaping contempt upon them. Because I am not contemptuous of them: I think they're fun. But I think that without the above very significant flaws they would be more successful fun. [Also note that I do not truly *hate* very many books at all.]
________
WENDIE 99