Chris Wooding
Registered User
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2009
- Messages
- 101
Nah. I did the whole anime thing back when I wrote Broken Sky in 1625 or whenever. Always ahead of the curve, me 
I've done a bit of reading around the interwebs, and I've seen some discussion about these books being YA. I've read this about a few authors that I myself wouldn't consider YA, such as Sanderson and Weeks. It seems that if there isn't persistent foul language or graphic description of violence and sex in a book, they get thrown into the YA bin.
Is there anyone here who would call these books YA? While reading Retribution Falls I didn't really get that vibe myself, but maybe my personal definition of YA fantasy needs adjustment.
Hopefully the writing and plotting will pick up a bit from book one, which frankly, seemed aimed at young teens rather than grown-ups with its unoriginality (ripping-off "Firefly" does not make one creative or original ) lack of any complexity , rather too obvious plotting and at best 1,5-dimensional characters.... There were vast spaces to improve into.
If the action was in any way realistic or at least gritty, that might not be a problem, but it is as bloodless, free of real threat to the protagonists and not even written "rousingly".... sorry, that's watered-down and diluted YA stuff.
This is the kind of stuff I've seen said about other books as well, in order to define them as YA. At the same time you notice that the title YA is used to scorn a book as not worth reading. Obviously I disagree with these comments, and presumably so would most people, but there they are. I've seen Sanderson and Weeks draw the same types of comments because of their lack of "grit" and sex as well.