Originally posted by nicba
Wow, FicusFan. Good reply!
Thanks. I had a lot to get off my chest.
It almost, but not quite, got me to revise my high opinion of the book. I think you made many good points in your review and it certainly got me thinking.
I was not lobbying for anyone to change their mind, but posting the points of the book that stood out for me. Seeing the posts from everyone else made me see how people could like the book, but I didn't have that experience.
I already had the book in my collection, because I had liked her earlier books -- which I do recommend-- so the choice for the month made me finally read it. Starting in December before the results were final, or I would still be slogging through it.
I am a bit odd in that once I start a book I almost never give up, even if I hate it. I am always looking for something worthwhile. This book did have its good points, but to me it was so far below her other 3 that I am probably not rational or impartial about my feelings for it.
That's a little extreme I think. Page 400 could perhaps be called the beginning of the end, i.e. the place where first begin to see our way towards a resolution, and starts to learn the true cause of the problems. Sure, the story might start a bit slow, with a gradual build-up, taking its own time to introduce the main characters.
I feel that there is little in the way of action/resolution or forward progress in telling the actual story of a group fighting against evil, until about page 400. Writers who are really skilled manage to work the set up into the main body of the story, so you get 3 or 4 strands all going at once, and it never feels like you have a big load of plot, backstory, or description dumped on you at once.
I read a lot, I also write fiction as a hobby. So I tend to look at the mechanics and construction of how stories are told, as well as what the content is. I just found a long stretch with not much going on, to me, no suspense was building, and there was little that was interesting or mysterious or that I really cared about.
But I actually thought of that as a strength, rather than a weakness. Instead of just having the wizard who 'summoned' Tessa meet her upon arrival and have him explain her quest at once, Tessa is left for herself to discover her own purpose. (..snip...) I thought that was a good move on the part of the author. A bit original, even.
I agree that the 'wizard ploy' is overdone and tired, but leaving her on her own, especially with the 'feisty modern woman syndrome' is right out of Diana Gabaldon's Highlander series.
In that we agree. I too found the art of illumination a really interesting approach to magic.
I was more intrigued with the details of the pigments and the bindings and the preparation of the surface to be illuminated and the instruments. I always like to learn something, and those details have the ring of authenticity -- how they might have done it in the middle ages.
He

And everyone else just agreed that the love afair was subtle and well-done. OK, maybe it wasn't that subtle after all. In that light the characters sure sounds a bit cardboard-cut. Still, for me it worked and didn't sound so contrived when I actually read the book.
It just seems to be the standard set up in the romance novels I read as a kid. Boy rescues girl,

girl hates boy,

boy plays it cool,

girl begins to secretly yearn for boy

. It would have perhaps seemed better to me, and maybe even subtle if I had liked the characters more. Ravis was a walking cliche but better than Tessa. I really disliked her from the start.
(…snip…) As for Ravis, I'll admit that his motive is a bit more murky
That was my main objection. His character is not one that would go around picking up strays, nor would he risk himself to save her life. He seems an opportunist who is always on the make. I didn’t see an angel in the alleyway to explain his sudden change of behavior.
In the first part of the story that did indeed seem to be the case. But, to the defense of J.V. Jones, I have to point out that it was later revealed that this wasn't true. It wasn't the kingdom of Garizon, nor even the kings of that kingdom, which were evil and which caused the wars. It was all the cause of the Coil. And even the coil wasn't evil, it was just 'doing its job,' namely creating wars.
Very true. But why couldn't she have worked that complexity into the story sooner ? We get a very black and white, standard story until she shows us the coil. I think the opening with the new king running naked in the woods with the coil, and the island with the monks, were all under used. They were good ideas but not developed, rather she went with something quick and simple and used the other stuff as minor decoration. She could even have had Tessa summoned by the coil itself, as it works to free itself. That would have been more original to my mind.
Yuck, I hated that dog! I really think that J.V. Jones over-did that 'no-good' dog thing. That was just a little bit too much for my taste. But otherwise I agree that Angeline was a good, unconventional character. So was the 'evil scribe,' which really wasn't that evil after all, but caught by his own greed for power and his emotional, if somewhat twisted, bond to his king. Wasn't the scribe one of the gray characters you asked for?
He was one of the only characters that I really cared about (Emith and his mother are the others), and I don't like dogs in real life (I am a cat person). I didn't think much of Angeline or the evil scribe. I thought they were standard 'victim characters’ in fantasy.
Yes the scribe was a study of shades of gray, just not very well done. I never felt that he cared about Izegard, and so was trapped at first by his concern for him. I never felt the crisis that made him pick Izegard over the other servant whom he essentially helped kill. I did get a good sense of his fear, but I didn't find his inaction at the beginning plausible. He had to have been intelligent and educated to be a scribe, yet he never thinks of a way out, or of trying to use his magic against Izegard. He never struggles to get free. Like most of the characters to me he lacks 'umph'.
I agree here too. Emith and his mother was perhaps some of the best suporting characters I've read about yet. In fact I think that all the 'secondary characters' of this book are excellent, and easily outweight any cheesy-ness the main characters may suffer from.
I did really like Emith and his mother. But I don't think the other secondary characters were all that good. Unfortunately 3 characters (Snowy, Emith, and Mom), who don't get a lot of stage time can't erase the cheesy, tired nature of the rest of the story for me.
Well, I think I would have missed plumbing too

. But regarding what you said about the women only being fought over, I think that was a little unfair. Tessa fights her own battle against the enemy scribe. In a way she is really fighting the 'real' battle, the one that wins the day in the end. And Angeline, the poor witless woman, really stands up for herself and her baby in the end, when she poisons Izegard.
Tessa is 'the modern woman' so she is expected to be different. But you're right she does fight the 'real' battle, and it seems it was unconventional for women to be scribes. But there are plenty of instances where JVJ makes clear that women can't stray out of their place. I don't want everyone to be unconventional, but since it is fantasy if you can imagine dragons and monsters, you can surely see a woman or two now and then doing something outside their traditional gender roles? Emith is a good start at showing a non-traditional male.
I disagree that Angeline stands up for herself. Poison is traditionally called a coward's weapon, and/or a woman's weapon. She never has to declare herself, and she never has to stand up for what she believes in. She just carries on as usual, pretending reality isn't happening to her, and then wanders off -- eventually killing the child herself through neglect.
If she had stood up to Izegard, or even declared that she was a worthwhile person deserving of respect and regard she might have died and the child might have died anyway, but she would have become a person rather than staying a doormat who drifts through life expecting someone else to deal with reality for her. She ends up casting Cameron as her next Prince Charming -- she has learned nothing about being responsible for herself. Whatever will she do to him, if in the future he fails to keep her happy ?
As to the final rating of the book, it must of course remain a matter of taste. I personally have a high tolerance for what is often called unoriginality by others. As long as it is well written, I mostly don't care. I found The Barbed Coil to be just that, a well written tale. For me, a whole bunch of high-quality 'secondary characters' and a very interesting magic system was more than enough to earn this book a place on the list of 'books to be recomended.'
Difference is what makes the world go round. My comments on the book are only my opinions and are not meant to apply to anyone else.
I can accept unoriginality only if there is something that grabs me, and interests me, or captures my emotions – this book did neither for me. I also think it was written much more poorly than her other 3. I will even hazard a guess that although this was published after the others she may have actually written it first. I think it has none of the skill of weaving the tale that she does so well in the trilogy.