New Star Trek Series; you in or out?

I guess in other countries it might appear on Netflix, which is a much better value proposition.
Yes: here in the UK we get it on Netflix.

I remember all the fuss about the All Access channel: have Paramount just ignored it and carried on regardless? Whatever they wanted from it, it must have worked, for them to create this new series.

I hadn't realised that this was a new series, btw: I thought that they were going to somehow fit him into the Discovery series. Yes, I know: but the recent films (and I guess even Generations) & the new TV series in their reimaginings have made anything possible.

Let's hope it works: Sir Patrick is, by all accounts, a wonderful human being and I have always thought highly of him that he has always defended SF & StarTrek against the sneering masses. Power to them, etc etc.
 
For me, Star Trek is The Next Generation, so I will be watching, even though I have ignored Discovery. Also love Patrick Stewart.
 
Patrick Stewart brought so much into the franchise. I welcome this news!

I'm re-watching TNG as we speak, actually (after many years - perfect filler for this hiatus between TV shows!)... I have enjoyed Discovery but why couldn't they stick to the old tried & tested episodic format like all the other series? But I'll happily stick with it...
 
Vaguely interested with the attachment of Patrick Stewart, but if they make this like Discovery I'll drop it very quickly.
 
I remember all the fuss about the All Access channel: have Paramount just ignored it and carried on regardless? Whatever they wanted from it, it must have worked, for them to create this new series.

CBS All Access is currently the only place to (legally) watch Star Trek: Discovery in the US. Although, I have heard they intend to release Season 1 on Blu-Ray.

As I understand it, Paramount does the movies, and CBS does the current TV series. All of the current movies are set in a different timeline, the Kelvin Timeline, also known as the JJ Verse (because it was spun off by JJ Abrams). Discovery is supposedly set in the original timeline.

OK, so now in the US, if you want to watch Discovery, you have to subscribe to the CBS All Access service, which is $5.99-$9.99/month (with or without commercials). This service only shows current and past CBS shows. If you like CBS content, maybe it’s somewhat worth it? But if all you want is Discovery, it feels like you are being overcharged. While all of the other Star Trek series are available elsewhere (Amazon Prime Video for example), Discovery is only via CBS All Access. CBS All Access is not available to cable subscribers who pay for CBS with their other channels, like Fox Now and other network services.

So, in the US, you have to subscribe to a premium service few wanted to watch one show. Many therefore have subscribed only while it was showing, then cancelled with the comments that they were only there for Discovery. Some waited till the season was done, signed up for one month, binged Discovery, then cancelled. Other people watch the show through non-legal means.

If CBS All Access becomes the only place in the US to watch a number of new Star Trek shows, this might inprove their subscribed base. This is probably what they are going for here.

I personally refuse to pay for CBS All Access. I am waiting till maybe can one can buy Discovery through iTunes, or stream it via Amazon Prime. I am willing to pay to support new Star Trek, just not willing to let CBS All Access use it to launch their unpopular and expense premium channel.

/rant
 
Thanks PD: you've summarised the situation nicely for me. I can see why such an arrangement would annoy.

Here I think I'm paying £7.99 a month for the whole of Netflix, which includes Discovery (but obviously also Lost in Space, Stranger Things and other stuff.)

But if this deal includes season 2 of Discovery & the Patrick Stewart series, it might persuade others to try. Could you take the offer, say, for a month, and then cancel? (Thoughts of people bingewatching 30-ish episodes and then cancelling springs to mind.)

Talking of cancelling, and seeing how you brought it up, here's some news I picked up today: http://www.digitalspy.com/movies/star-trek/news/a863693/star-trek-4-chris-pine-chris-hemsworth-quit/

Now this might be jockeying for more money, but it doesn't sound great. Perhaps they could be added to the new series? :D
 
Here I think I'm paying £7.99 a month for the whole of Netflix, which includes Discovery (but obviously also Lost in Space, Stranger Things and other stuff.)

But if this deal includes season 2 of Discovery & the Patrick Stewart series, it might persuade others to try. Could you take the offer, say, for a month, and then cancel? (Thoughts of people bingewatching 30-ish episodes and then cancelling springs to mind.

Yes, one can cancel at anytime, so binging for a month or two is a viable option. Some people plan on doing so.

You have hit on the other painful aspect with CBS All Access, it is only the case in the US. In the rest of world, new Star Trek is available on Netflix. Netflix is a much better value, and has much more worthwhile content.
 
TNG is probably my favorite TV show of all time. It just feels like home more than anything, a place I can go back to that makes me feel good. I love the TNG finale and think it was the perfect way to end the series; it utilized all the best qualities of the show and then even took the stuff I didn't like and made them great (before the finale I was never a big fan of Q). It showed a possible future but also left the fates of the characters up to the audience, which weirdly enough worked for me considering the show was more about life than any significant individual force affecting the characters/universe (sometimes people are just people and live normal--sometimes exciting--but normal lives without some climactic sacrifice to give them meaning in the face of the universe).

After I saw the finale I sat down and watched the TNG movies and... well I don't really care about them. I just ignore them for the most part since they don't work for me as films, don't carry the spirit of the show, and kind of ruin the characters (or seem to misunderstand them).

SO, the point of all this is for me to say that bringing back Picard is a decision that leaves me sort of indifferent. Patrick Stewart is much older now and I don't know if I have confidence in the writers/directors to do him justice. I love Picard but I was always a little more invested in the story of the crew as a whole than just him as an individual. I already got the perfect conclusion to TNG and Picard's story, so if this new show turns out good then it'll just be icing on the cake (because the movies don't exist ;P ). I'm really more curious about the state of the universe in general and how far technology has come. What does Star Fleet look like? Are androids commonplace now? These are the questions I'm more interested in getting answers for, and Picard can have a place in all that but it would feel strange for me to see him apart from the crew--his family. Maybe that's the angle they're going with and can actually spin that into a decent narrative: what happens when your family moves on and the kids grow up? What do you make of your life?

I'm hoping they get creative with this rather than just use Patrick Stewart as a way to restore the enthusiasm and trust of the fans after Discovery (which tbh is what this very much feels like, at least in part). If they give Picard a love interest I really hope they don't make him married to Dr. Crusher, but instead have him living with Nella Daren from "Lessons," which I thought was a beautiful love story that I bought into way more than with Crusher or that weird archeologist lady. They really came off as kin spirits and if Picard is no longer a captain (I'd like to see him as an ambassador rather than an admiral) then it makes sense for them to pick up what the circumstances at the time wouldn't allow.

It's still weird thinking about a Picard-centric TV show, but I guess for now I'll let my curiosity make me a little enthusiastic for a first look.

I also agree with what's been said about CBS All Access; It's a worthless app that only has Star Trek to interest me. I really hate this trend where every company ever decided they need a streaming service to compete with Netflix, Amazon, Hulu, and the likes despite them not having the content to be worth the money. How long is it gonna be before the sum of all those streaming services to watch the shows/movies I like equals cable? Disney making their own service I get, since they already have Hulu and a whole library of classics, but then I hear about Apple trying to get into the market and I just get depressed. I'm sick of CBS holding the series behind an additional paywall when it'd be more than at home on Netflix (how it is in Europe currently). It's just plain mean.

P.S. Sorry for the long posts, I just got a lot to say... :)
 
Sorry for the long posts, I just got a lot to say...
Absolutely not a problem. We like long posts at SFFWorld..... :)

Your post is a thoughtful one (we like those too...)

Must admit I'm a little unsure myself. We've moved away from the Roddenbury ideal quite a way, haven't we?

Not always a bad thing - some of those ideas he had for some of the movies were dreadful, and Encounter on Farpoint is still awful, IMO (it got so much better later) - but whatever we end up with has to work.

You've highlighted some exciting ideas though and I think that this where the new series might work - it must go forward... less retrofitting, more new ideas is what we need...

Having said that, The Orville series is better than I thought it would be - and perhaps more in line with how I once thought things would go with the Next Generation - admittedly with a tad more humour...

M.
 
Unfortunately for CBS and the latest Star Trek, I'm not watching CBS All Access because I'm not paying for a service that provides me with very little I want to watch. Having cut cable a while back, I have already gone through the if you don't subscribe you don't see it anymore scenario. Patrick Stewart's new show sounds like it could be amazing, but also tied to the cinder block of All Access, I won't be seeing it. No Netflix. I have amazon TV only because I have amazon, though they are steadily working on making the service over valued. One value I appreciate is being able to see something I haven't seen before. But it has to be more than one or two programs. The other streaming service is $5 and I can find plenty to watch on it. That leaves the outdoor antenna, okay for checking out the past, other times trying to pick up digital TV signals that blow away in the wind. Still has the various Star Treks on it. Some channels only appear during the worst storms. If the new Star Trek was free I would check it out. Missed the first two shows, don't feel like I missed anything. Saw the original Star Treks and movies, but have been consistently missing most of the new Star Treks when they first came out. The movies have been hit or miss. Prefer some of the TNG movies because they're a one shot deal, otherwise TNG series is really hit or miss for me. I liked the Abrams movies, they cruise at a good warp speed.

Serials free up writers valuable time so they can concentrate on more important issues. The problem is what constitutes a more important issue. For the most part, modern day issues are not drivers of the story, they are drivers of audience participation in the creative effort. It is harder to write a complete story every week than it is to keep picking up lose threads that lead to nothing new technologically speaking. I like Expanse for the story telling aspect. The steadily increasing character development means to me that the writers can back off on the quality of the story's details and backfill empty spaces with personal emotional conflicts. The character's personalities went a long way towards shaping the plot of the story, but will probably end up taking up time by their personal interactions that have nothing to do with the story. That was pretty much how I viewed Babylon 5 and TNG.

The ship itself is in a weird situation. The look of the ship is important probably because the ship itself can't do anything special. I wish it could show technological experiences that could be applied to today's world. A ship that advanced probably has to act like a living entity, taking care of itself. There are no time outs in space. That leaves dazzling artistic creation, a distraction on one hand but also a chance to bring out the audience's admiration, if it can.
 
We all recall how vital saucer separation was and how often it was used in TNG:confused:
 
Unfortunately for CBS and the latest Star Trek, I'm not watching CBS All Access because I'm not paying for a service that provides me with very little I want to watch. Having cut cable a while back, I have already gone through the if you don't subscribe you don't see it anymore scenario. Patrick Stewart's new show sounds like it could be amazing, but also tied to the cinder block of All Access, I won't be seeing it. No Netflix. I have amazon TV only because I have amazon, though they are steadily working on making the service over valued. One value I appreciate is being able to see something I haven't seen before. But it has to be more than one or two programs. The other streaming service is $5 and I can find plenty to watch on it. That leaves the outdoor antenna, okay for checking out the past, other times trying to pick up digital TV signals that blow away in the wind. Still has the various Star Treks on it. Some channels only appear during the worst storms. If the new Star Trek was free I would check it out. Missed the first two shows, don't feel like I missed anything. Saw the original Star Treks and movies, but have been consistently missing most of the new Star Treks when they first came out. The movies have been hit or miss. Prefer some of the TNG movies because they're a one shot deal, otherwise TNG series is really hit or miss for me. I liked the Abrams movies, they cruise at a good warp speed.

Serials free up writers valuable time so they can concentrate on more important issues. The problem is what constitutes a more important issue. For the most part, modern day issues are not drivers of the story, they are drivers of audience participation in the creative effort. It is harder to write a complete story every week than it is to keep picking up lose threads that lead to nothing new technologically speaking. I like Expanse for the story telling aspect. The steadily increasing character development means to me that the writers can back off on the quality of the story's details and backfill empty spaces with personal emotional conflicts. The character's personalities went a long way towards shaping the plot of the story, but will probably end up taking up time by their personal interactions that have nothing to do with the story. That was pretty much how I viewed Babylon 5 and TNG.

The ship itself is in a weird situation. The look of the ship is important probably because the ship itself can't do anything special. I wish it could show technological experiences that could be applied to today's world. A ship that advanced probably has to act like a living entity, taking care of itself. There are no time outs in space. That leaves dazzling artistic creation, a distraction on one hand but also a chance to bring out the audience's admiration, if it can.

Since you currently are subscribed to Amazon Prime Video, you can watch all of the Star Trek series except for Discovery. Even the Animated Series is on Amazon. I’m currently re-watching Deep Space 9...
 
I rather suspect that this discussion may end up split between those who watch on a streaming service and those who (sort've) pay-per-view.

It has got me thinking about what future innovations it may develop - where do we think the Holodeck will be in the future? Or what design can they add to the Enterprise?

I actually think they should start again as the original, admittedly iconic, does limit things a little. Having said that, The Excelsior I quite liked as an upgrade....
 
When I was young and Star Trek was the be-all and end-all of science fiction television, I never thought I'd be saying this today... but I realize I've outgrown Star Trek, and want to move on.

Not that I hate the shows (though I stopped watching when Voyager was done, and I think the Abramsverse sucks eggs), but the whole premise of thinly-disguised American military adventures against thinly-disguised non-Americans in space just leaves me cold. I realized not long ago that when Star Trek was introduced, Flash Gordon was the big-deal sci-fi that everyone knew and talked about, and Trek was so more advanced than Flash that it was quickly unseated in popularity and relevance. So here we are, still adoring a sci-fi series whose premise is twice as dated as Flash Gordon was when Trek came out...

I'm ready for more modern sci-fi premises, whether it's The Expanse, Cowboy BeBop, Person of Interest, Orphan Black, or something else. I'm passing on New Trek.
 
Absolutely not a problem. We like long posts at SFFWorld..... :)

Your post is a thoughtful one (we like those too...)

Must admit I'm a little unsure myself. We've moved away from the Roddenbury ideal quite a way, haven't we?

Not always a bad thing - some of those ideas he had for some of the movies were dreadful, and Encounter on Farpoint is still awful, IMO (it got so much better later) - but whatever we end up with has to work.

You've highlighted some exciting ideas though and I think that this where the new series might work - it must go forward... less retrofitting, more new ideas is what we need...

Having said that, The Orville series is better than I thought it would be - and perhaps more in line with how I once thought things would go with the Next Generation - admittedly with a tad more humour...

M.

I keep hearing good things about the Orville and if I ever see it on Netflix or some other streaming service I will definitely give it a watch!

I think the Roddenberry ideal is hard to hold up to but something Star Trek shows should strive towards. I feel like DS9 is an excellent example of a show challenging the Roddenberry ideal while holding true to the spirit of Star Trek. Even though the characters have interpersonal conflicts, those conflicts are important since they are used to make progress in the relationships between characters and to build trust that's sort of assumed in TNG. I always think about how Miles started out hating Bashir but how eventually by overcoming their preconceptions and expectations learned to create a powerful friendship/bond. I think Discovery has a lot to learn from DS9, which pulls off the darker tone with a balance of heart and humor perfectly.

I rather suspect that this discussion may end up split between those who watch on a streaming service and those who (sort've) pay-per-view.

It has got me thinking about what future innovations it may develop - where do we think the Holodeck will be in the future? Or what design can they add to the Enterprise?

I actually think they should start again as the original, admittedly iconic, does limit things a little. Having said that, The Excelsior I quite liked as an upgrade....

Oof, I'm sorry to say I despise the Excelsior design/Enterprise B. It's one of many ships whose essential design when broken down is just the Enterprise but worse. Granted I'm sure it has a lot more appeal other than its visual design but that's sort of how I judge star ships. Then again I don't really like most of Star Trek's ship designs other than the original Constitution class Enterprise, which I think is actually why I like Discovery's ships; they seem to do a lot more with the saucer shape and make each ship class feel truly unique.

Oh boy I love thinking about what they could do next! I wouldn't want to see another Enterprise but there's so much they could do with the next flagship! Imagine the entire ship is outfitted with holo emitters, and most furniture in crew quarters is actually holographic but the technology is so sophisticated that one would never know (imagine little kids playing pranks on each other by making chairs disappear beneath their friends!) until some episode where the holo emitters are broken or taken over. That episode would be so beautiful because the entire ship's interior would be glitchy and fluid, and the very essence of reality would be contentious.

I'm imagining the next flagship to be all about art and uniting the cultures of different species. Imagine wood paneling with moving renaissance-style art on the bridge. The ship would be large enough to have large public spaces like an open garden and art galleries. Imagine a Borg embassy on board where the Borg are like the ones from the Voyager episode "Unity." Their light telepathic link to one another makes them intimate and spiritual (maybe even sexually liberal) rather than cold and robotic.

Androids are common place now and all capable of emotions, but they don't hate humans and instead humans act as parent figures to them. Imagine androids meeting up in an art gallery to try and replicate a Data Original piece and going to group therapy to discuss the intricacies of consciousness and the differences between them and biological life. You know what, screw it, make the ships counselor an android. And make them an aspiring theater actor or something.

Imagine the ship having regenerative hull plating that uses nanites to "heal" itself, making it viable to carry families and non crew personnel on board. The ship would practically have a blood stream made from the bio gel seen in Voyager, except they aren't limited to gel packs but run in veins throughout the ship. The ship would practically be an organism in itself, a living home. Engineers will not just be technicians, but doctors.

And think about the Klingons! I'm imagining Worf's son Alex to be a high ranking officer (maybe even first officer) who struggles with his culture and has depressive tenancies from serving years on klingon ships (imagine a klingon, but with like PTSD). He challenges the stereotypes held about klingons and their alleged violent nature and seeks to study klingon history with a focus on the way the warrior class seized power and manipulated the historical narrative to focus on power and conquest. I'm imagining an immense amount of diversity on board and among the crew. Let's get a Romulan bridge officer!

Transporters are super fast and sophisticated and have for the most part replaced lifts/elevators, making movement around the ship fluid and quick (like how the Enterprise J is described). There are cultural centers, cafeterias, schools, etc. Information moves around organically on board; imagine someone transferring a film or schematic or whatever from their tablet to a wall with the swipe of a finger. Every surface is a screen, so crew can customize their quarters by having the walls be animated with calming rain or other patterns to fit their needs/personalities. I would really want the ship to feel alive but still be a hub/place for people create their own spaces and communities within.

The show surrounding this flagship in my mind would be focused less on action and a lot more on characters, people, and exploring new places. I'd want the show and the ship to example the best of humanity, to show a place that is about people, art, knowledge, technology. I'd want to see a lot more episodes focusing on the crew and their families. If this were made, I'd want the pilot to literally be a love story between two people on board. The senior officers have already been doing their jobs for a little bit, it's a comfortable place that moves at the speeds of minds and hearts. It's exciting because it isn't about action and stakes. It's about life and when it is about death it's about the philosophy of it and the way people/cultures interact/understand it.

I want Star Trek not just to move forward, but to make up for the time it has been stagnant. I don't like Discovery because it goes backwards and does less with the world. I want to see a world that is truly about love, overcoming prejudice, diversity, and making up for our histories. I don't care about militaristic Star Trek; I want to see it double down on what TNG started and really make it about people. Why not devote a whole episode to a young member of the crew overcoming their fears to perform at a talent show on board? Why not show the senior crew and larger political landscape operating from an inner perspective looking out? (What I hated most about Voyager is that we rarely saw a crew beyond the senior staff. I'd be fine if there are episodes where we don't even see the senior staff except in passing or mention. Their impact should be constantly felt but the whole world/ship community shouldn't revolve around them. One of my favorite TNG episodes is when we follow the stories of younger crew members trying to get promoted and aspiring to the senior staff as these larger than life symbols of authority and maturity) I want a Star Trek show where the world feels big but small, where technology is not just something to learn how to deal with but something that can be integrated into society and the lives of people in a healthy way.

Sorry for going nuts again with this post, but I just love to think about what could be and feel a little disappointed that it seems very few people from the circles I've seen share this vision of Star Trek. I've got a lot of love in my heart and want to see a show that shares that love.
 
Again: no need to apologise - it makes your PoV clearer.

We all don't have to agree, btw: I'm sure that opinions will vary (we are a discussion site, after all!)

And your point about the Excelsior is why I was thinking that a radical new design is needed, perhaps - we may have gone as far as we can with the old design.

Which is why I totally see what Steven is saying: I've banged on regularly here about why books/TV/films keep rehashing the old ideas when there's so many other just as great ideas out there to use instead. (Clue: they make money/get viewers because of the brand.)

But in the unlikely event new stuff will appear (though you never know - we could have both!) then the old stuff is OK, providing it works...
 
Wanted to revisit this thread to say that Star Trek: Discovery is now available to purchase via iTunes as well as on Blu-Ray. Both include a lot of special features and behind the scenes content. I purchased it on iTunes and have been watching it. My posistion was always that I supported Star Trek, but would not support CBS All-Access.

I’m about halfway through Season 1, and I like it so far. The Klingons are too over the top though. I also would like it if things were a bit better lit. With matter/antimatter energy generation, it seems like you could spare some energy on lighting. Regardless, I like the Star Fleet characters, and Saru is awesome.
 
Not streaming CBS so forgot about it, now that used dvds are in the market place I can see what the show looks like.
 
35 bucks for a tv show single season is a lot when a tentpole film with all the extras is $20 or less yes I know there are many more hours of 'entertainment' but perhaps waiting for the blu-ray's ti hit the remainder bin will be kinder to retirement sized budget
 

Sponsors


We try to keep the forum as free of ads as possible, please consider supporting SFFWorld on Patreon


Your ad here.
Back
Top