I finished The Last Argument of Kings this morning. It has confirmed my opinion of Joe Abercrombie as an exciting new writer, whose best work is still ahead of him, yet still has a lot of room for improvement. His prose is patchy, better suited to his lovingly rendered action sequences than other passages. His characterisation is often too cartoonish, which has led some reviewers to make slightly inappropriate comparisons to Jack Vance. His world building, something I see as an important element in epic fantasy of this kind, is his greatest weakness. I found all three books to contain pacing problems, and I really struggled to will myself through sections of this book; particularly after the resolution of the Bethod plot strand. The battle in the Union that comes after is rushed in comparison with the events which have previously taken place in the North, and ultimately anticlimactic. I think there was far too much for him to resolve in this book, but he gave it a damn good shot.
As the end to the trilogy, there is some inevitable disappointment, but for the main part I did walk away with from this feeling satisfied. Some plot strands were closed off, while others were left open hinting at possible sequels, which I didn’t mind. As with previous volumes, Logen’s story was the most interesting. I found my self somewhat annoyed at the revelations regarding Bayaz. I know it wasn’t a twist that anybody couldn’t see coming, but it just seemed to make redundant the whole narrative that preceded that point, almost a dues ex machina. I really dislike plots where the actions of all characters have been heavily manipulated so as to remove any sense of agency in their contribution to the story.
While I think these books are overpraised, particularly on internet discussion boards such as this one, it does strike me that Abercrombie has popularised fantasy featuring amoral characters, with generous lashings of horrific violence and explicit sex, to an extent which I hope only leads the genre in interesting directions. Despite the flaws of these books, they do read like a fresh of breath air in the much-maligned epic fantasy field. I know that works such as Martin’s ASOIAF feature villains and amoral or flawed characters heavily, but let’s face it, Martin and others like him also serve up there fair share of comforting, heroic characters we find it easy to root for. Abercrombie doesn’t offer his readers any comfort, and every character seems to have a nasty streak that outweighs his or her good side. In some ways, I feel this trilogy shares more in common with British space opera than it does traditional epic fantasy and I hope this develops into a trend in the genre. I’m not sure that this trilogy will be remembered in a few years time as a classic, like I think Rothfuss’ will if he can maintain the quality of his first book, but I did find them an enjoyable, and maybe groundbreaking work.