Okay - i see where i am disagreeing with people now (and sort of why).
Shan suggests that her ''power of not-believing'' theory applies only to the "supernatural dimension". I don't believe there IS a supernatural dimension - hence one source of disagreement!!
Who was talking about perception? Not sure...
Anyway - totally agree with what you say.....but don't actually see how it has any bearing. Perception and belief are totally intertwined. Neither one has affected reality. The bogey in the closet never was there - your change in perception/belief has changed nothing about your physical world. Instead, your changed belief simply RECOGNISES the truth that always was.
On the other hand - the easy examples of belief changing fact are illness, and atheletics.
I honestly believe that, even when compliance, lifestyle etc are accounted for, the person who BELIEVES he or she is going to get better is more likely to. Taking it to an extreme, the person who BELIEVES that they will die is more likely to. HOWEVER, the person who DOES NOT believe they are going to get better only influences his outcome because he BELIEVES he is NOT going to get better. Also,imo, degree of belief runs on a sliding scale: the greater the belief of the athlete in his ability, the faster he runs. (and htis, i believe, has also been proven in trials)
I think my point is that we don't change fact by NOT believing, but we can influence a state by BELIEVEING the OPPOSITE to be true.[/i]. To take Shan's example, she BELIEVED that the noises in her room were NOT real (although, it's a poor example, because in this case she didn't CHANGE the truth, she merely recognised it.)
Another example. An athlete who stops believing in his ability may have a decreased track time, for 2 reasons: 1) he has decreased belief in his ability - hence the power of his belief to increase his speed has decreased. 2) he believes he can NOT run fast.
The stronger the belief, the stronger the affect. Hence my statement that DISbelief is weak. It is the absence of belief, and hence the absence of a source of power.
Appologies for ranting - am getting very deep into my own personal belief system/life philosophy at this point, hence the ''going on''

.